Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration test for user defined parameterizing rules #289

Conversation

yui-knk
Copy link
Collaborator

@yui-knk yui-knk commented Dec 11, 2023

There are two blockers to merge this test case.

  1. #yyr2 assumes rules are sorted by id. But it's not ensured when rules are generated by parameterizing rule. This was solved by Sort Rules by id #288.
  2. ParameterizingRuleRhsBuilder only accept one symbol for rhs (#symbol). But it should accept arbitrary number of symbols. Fix failed integration test for user defined parameterizing rules #291 will fix this issue.

@yui-knk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yui-knk commented Dec 12, 2023

This was solved by #288 and #291.

@yui-knk yui-knk closed this Dec 12, 2023
@yui-knk yui-knk deleted the test_for_user_defined_parameterizing_rules branch December 12, 2023 02:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant