Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Isolate test_gc_compact on msys2 AppVeyor
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
k0kubun committed Apr 27, 2019
1 parent bc01f7b commit afb361d
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions appveyor.yml
Expand Up @@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ for:
- if not "%GEMS_FOR_TEST%" == "" ..\install\bin\gem install --no-document %GEMS_FOR_TEST%
test_script:
- mingw32-make test
- mingw32-make test-all TESTOPTS="--retry --job-status=normal --show-skip --subprocess-timeout-scale=1.5 --excludes=../ruby/test/excludes/_appveyor -j %JOBS% --exclude win32ole --exclude test_open-uri"
- mingw32-make test-all TESTOPTS="--retry --job-status=normal --show-skip --subprocess-timeout-scale=1.5 --excludes=../ruby/test/excludes/_appveyor -j %JOBS% --exclude win32ole --exclude test_open-uri --exclude test_gc_compact"
# separately execute tests without -j which may crash worker with -j.
- mingw32-make test-all TESTOPTS="--retry --job-status=normal --show-skip --subprocess-timeout-scale=1.5 --excludes=../ruby/test/excludes/_appveyor" TESTS="../ruby/test/win32ole ../ruby/test/open-uri/test_open-uri.rb"
- mingw32-make test-all TESTOPTS="--retry --job-status=normal --show-skip --subprocess-timeout-scale=1.5 --excludes=../ruby/test/excludes/_appveyor" TESTS="../ruby/test/win32ole ../ruby/test/open-uri/test_open-uri.rb ../ruby/test/ruby/test_gc_compact.rb"
- mingw32-make test-spec MSPECOPT=-fs # not using `-j` because sometimes `mspec -j` silently dies on Windows
notifications:
# Using "Webhook" with templated body to skip notification on Pull Request
Expand Down

2 comments on commit afb361d

@MSP-Greg
Copy link
Contributor

@MSP-Greg MSP-Greg commented on afb361d Apr 27, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@k0kubun

For the first time, I just had the same SEGV on ruby-loco, as I haven't yet seen a need to split test-all into parallel & serial (? non-parallel ?). I briefly compared the output, and both were very similar.

Started another build on 0d227d1, and (of course), it passed... BTW, it was build 2000...

@k0kubun
Copy link
Member Author

@k0kubun k0kubun commented on afb361d Apr 28, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As said before, if you tell or need something, please file Redmine ticket instead of mentioning me in person here, so that other people can easily notice and join the discussion. Thanks.

Please sign in to comment.