[DOC] Use www.rfc-editor.org for RFC text #10391
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We use the following site for that now: * https://tools.ietf.org/ or http * https://datatracker.ietf.org or http Today, IETF said the official site of RFC is www.rfc-editor.org. FYI: https://authors.ietf.org/en/references-in-rfcxml I replaced them to www.rfc-editor.org.
hsbt
changed the title
This was referenced Mar 28, 2024
kou
pushed a commit
to ruby/csv
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2024
See details ruby/ruby#10391 We should use `www.rfc-editor.org` for RFC references. I update docs in csv.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We use the following site for that now:
Today, IETF said the official site of RFC is www.rfc-editor.org.
FYI: https://authors.ietf.org/en/references-in-rfcxml
I replaced them to www.rfc-editor.org.