Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fast path for iseq-to-iseq bmethod call #6428

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

XrXr
Copy link
Member

@XrXr XrXr commented Sep 24, 2022

Previously, when a Ruby caller calls a Ruby block method (defined by define_method, etc.), we used the code for calling Ruby block method from C code. This involved argument copying and re-entering vm_exec_core which was extra work. This used to be necessary for firing TracePoint events, but that issue was resolved in 9121e57.

This patch reuse the interpreter invocation we're already in and avoids the extra argument copying for this situation.

benchmark/vm_defined_method.yml shows a nice improvement.

 patched:   4952460.5 i/s
  master:   2490187.6 i/s - 1.99x  slower

Previously, when a Ruby caller calls a Ruby block method (defined by
`define_method`, etc.), we used the code for calling Ruby block method
from C code. This involved argument copying and re-entering
`vm_exec_core` which was extra work. This used to be necessary for
firing TracePoint events, but that issue was resolved in
9121e57.

This patch reuse the interpreter invocation we're already in and avoids
the extra argument copying for this situation.

benchmark/vm_defined_method.yml shows a nice improvement.

     patched:   4952460.5 i/s
      master:   2490187.6 i/s - 1.99x  slower
@nobu nobu changed the title Fast path for iseq-to-iseq bemthod call Fast path for iseq-to-iseq bmethod call Oct 10, 2022
XrXr added a commit to XrXr/ruby that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Previously, when a Ruby caller calls a Ruby block method (defined by
`define_method`, etc.), we used the code for calling Ruby block method
from C code. This involved argument shifting and re-entering
vm_exec_core() which was more work than necessary. Re-entering
vm_exec_core() used to be necessary for firing TracePoint events, but
that's no longer the case since 9121e57.

This patch reuse the interpreter invocation we're already in and avoids
the argument shifting for this situation. It uses the same stack layout
as the JITs and so is using VM_FRAME_FLAG_STACK_RECV. C-to-ISeq bmethod
calls continue to use a different layout (See invoke_iseq_block_from_c()).

benchmark/vm_defined_method.yml shows a nice improvement.

     patched:   7578743.1 i/s
      master:   4796596.3 i/s - 1.58x  slower

Closes ruby#6428
XrXr added a commit to XrXr/ruby that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
Previously, when a Ruby caller calls a Ruby block method (defined by
`define_method`, etc.), we used the code for calling Ruby block method
from C code. This involved argument shifting and re-entering
vm_exec_core() which was more work than necessary. Re-entering
vm_exec_core() used to be necessary for firing TracePoint events, but
that's no longer the case since 9121e57.

This patch reuse the interpreter invocation we're already in and avoids
the argument shifting for this situation. It uses the same stack layout
as the JITs and so is using VM_FRAME_FLAG_STACK_RECV. C-to-ISeq bmethod
calls continue to use a different layout (See invoke_iseq_block_from_c()).

benchmark/vm_defined_method.yml shows a nice improvement.

     patched:   7578743.1 i/s
      master:   4796596.3 i/s - 1.58x  slower

Closes ruby#6428
XrXr added a commit to XrXr/ruby that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2023
This commit removes the __bp__ field from rb_control_frame_t. It was
introduced to help MJIT, but since MJIT was replaced by RJIT, we can use
vm_base_ptr() to compute it from the SP of the previous control frame
instead. Removing the field avoids needing to set it up when pushing new
frames.

Simply removing __bp__ would cause crashes since RJIT and YJIT used a
slightly different stack layout for bmethod calls than the interpreter.
At the moment of the call, the two layouts looked as follows:

                   ┌────────────┐    ┌────────────┐
                   │ frame_base │    │ frame_base │
                   ├────────────┤    ├────────────┤
                   │    ...     │    │    ...     │
                   ├────────────┤    ├────────────┤
                   │    args    │    │    args    │
                   ├────────────┤    └────────────┘<─prev_frame_sp
                   │  receiver  │
    prev_frame_sp─>└────────────┘
                     RJIT & YJIT      interpreter

Essentially, vm_base_ptr() needs to compute the address to frame_base
given prev_frame_sp in the diagrams. The presence of the receiver
created an off-by-one situation.

Make the interpreter use the layout the JITs use for iseq-to-iseq
bmethod calls. Doing so removes unnecessary argument shifting and
vm_exec_core() re-entry from the interpreter, yielding a speed
improvement visible through `benchmark/vm_defined_method.yml`:

     patched:   7578743.1 i/s
      master:   4796596.3 i/s - 1.58x  slower

C-to-iseq bmethod calls now store one more VALUE than before, but that
should have negligible impact on overall performance.

Note that re-entering vm_exec_core() used to be necessary for firing
TracePoint events, but that's no longer the case since
9121e57.

Closes ruby#6428
maximecb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2023
Remove rb_control_frame_t::__bp__ and optimize bmethod calls

This commit removes the __bp__ field from rb_control_frame_t. It was
introduced to help MJIT, but since MJIT was replaced by RJIT, we can use
vm_base_ptr() to compute it from the SP of the previous control frame
instead. Removing the field avoids needing to set it up when pushing new
frames.

Simply removing __bp__ would cause crashes since RJIT and YJIT used a
slightly different stack layout for bmethod calls than the interpreter.
At the moment of the call, the two layouts looked as follows:

                   ┌────────────┐    ┌────────────┐
                   │ frame_base │    │ frame_base │
                   ├────────────┤    ├────────────┤
                   │    ...     │    │    ...     │
                   ├────────────┤    ├────────────┤
                   │    args    │    │    args    │
                   ├────────────┤    └────────────┘<─prev_frame_sp
                   │  receiver  │
    prev_frame_sp─>└────────────┘
                     RJIT & YJIT      interpreter

Essentially, vm_base_ptr() needs to compute the address to frame_base
given prev_frame_sp in the diagrams. The presence of the receiver
created an off-by-one situation.

Make the interpreter use the layout the JITs use for iseq-to-iseq
bmethod calls. Doing so removes unnecessary argument shifting and
vm_exec_core() re-entry from the interpreter, yielding a speed
improvement visible through `benchmark/vm_defined_method.yml`:

     patched:   7578743.1 i/s
      master:   4796596.3 i/s - 1.58x  slower

C-to-iseq bmethod calls now store one more VALUE than before, but that
should have negligible impact on overall performance.

Note that re-entering vm_exec_core() used to be necessary for firing
TracePoint events, but that's no longer the case since
9121e57.

Closes #6428
@XrXr XrXr deleted the bmethod-same-interpreter branch July 17, 2023 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
1 participant