New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Project incorrectly flagged as bugfix fork #405
Comments
Hey @mattyr, thanks for reporting this! The culprit is the 100% equal gem description A quick fix you could do would be to simply adjust your gem's description to have different wording, but I'll also investigate expanding the description matching to the gem's other metadata. The assumption for the description equality fork detection is that forked gems rarely see changes to their gemspec metadata, so finding them by description worked well for the gems I inspected. I will look into this in the next week or so. Just for reference so it's also linked from the original PR that introduced the changes: #377 |
Thanks, and I can see there certainly is some merit in trying that description-driven approach. I can alter the description for now; if there's additional info/help I can provide, let me know! |
Excellent, thanks @mattyr! Let's leave this issue open though so I don't forget to look more closely into potentially expanding the existing approach into other gem data, your gem likely isn't the only one that will run into this problem |
Haven't received any further reports of this in over a year, so I'm just gonna close this one as it generally doesn't seem to be a big issue |
https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/projects/sidecloq appears to be incorrectly flagged as a bugfix fork of sidetiq; it is not (I'm the creator). Reporting per https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/pages/docs/features/bugfix_forks -- let me know if more info is needed!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: