New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
poller handling the same requests multiple times #6376
Comments
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
rcarpa
added a commit
to rcarpa/rucio
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
bari12
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2023
The protection provided by older_than, mentioned in 33f9578, was over-estimated.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
issue introduced in 33f9578
The protection mentioned there doesn't work well enough. We should probably accept occasional database deadlocks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: