Usability: critical error in case of unneeded second channel #6419

firmware/config/boards/f407-discovery/board_configuration.cpp

@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ void setBoardDefaultConfiguration() {
 	engineConfiguration->triggerSimulatorPins[1] = Gpio::D2;
 
 	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[0] = Gpio::C6;
-	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::A5;
+//	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::A5;
 
 	// set this to SPI_DEVICE_3 to enable stimulation
 	//engineConfiguration->digitalPotentiometerSpiDevice = SPI_DEVICE_3;

firmware/config/engines/ford_1995_inline_6.cpp

@@ -87,5 +87,5 @@ void setFordInline6() {
 	engineConfiguration->mafAdcChannel = EFI_ADC_1;
 
 	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[0] = Gpio::A8;
-	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::A5;
+  engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::Unassigned;
 }

firmware/config/engines/ford_aspire.cpp

@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ void setFordAspireEngineConfiguration() {
 	engineConfiguration->tpsMax = 750;
 
 	engineConfiguration->rpmHardLimit = 7000;
+#if HW_FRANKENSO
+  engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::A5;
+#endif
 
 	/**
 	 * 18K Ohm @ -20C

firmware/controllers/trigger/decoders/trigger_structure.cpp

@@ -771,6 +771,17 @@ void TriggerWaveform::initializeTriggerWaveform(operation_mode_e triggerOperatio
 		warning(ObdCode::CUSTOM_ERR_NO_SHAPE, "initializeTriggerWaveform() not implemented: %d", triggerType.type);
 	}
 
+	if (!needSecondTriggerInput &&
+#if EFI_UNIT_TEST
+ 	engineConfiguration != nullptr &&
+#endif
+	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] != Gpio::Unassigned) {
+// todo: technical debt: HW CI should not require special treatment
+#ifndef HARDWARE_CI
+	  criticalError("Single-channel trigger %s selected while two inputs were configured", getTrigger_type_e(triggerType.type));
+#endif
+	}
+
 	/**
 	 * Feb 2019 suggestion: it would be an improvement to remove 'expectedEventCount' logic from 'addEvent'
 	 * and move it here, after all events were added.

java_console/autotest/src/main/java/com/rusefi/f4discovery/CommonFunctionalTest.java

@@ -196,13 +196,11 @@ public void test2003DodgeNeon() {
         EcuTestHelper.assertSomewhatClose("VBatt", 12, SensorCentral.getInstance().getValue(Sensor.VBATT));
 
         chart = nextChart();
-        double x = 100;
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_1);
         assertWaveNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_2);
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_3);
         assertWaveNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_4);
 
-        x = 176.856;
         // todo: why is width precision so low here? is that because of loaded Windows with 1ms precision?
         double widthRatio = 0.25;
         // WAT? this was just 0.009733333333333387?
@@ -216,14 +214,12 @@ public void test2003DodgeNeon() {
         ecu.changeRpm(2700);
         ecu.changeRpm(2000);
         chart = nextChart();
-        x = 104.0;
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_1);
         assertWaveNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_2);
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_3);
         assertWaveNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_4);
 
         chart = nextChart();
-        x = 74;
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.INJECTOR_1);
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.INJECTOR_2);
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.INJECTOR_3);
@@ -238,12 +234,10 @@ public void test2003DodgeNeon() {
 
         ecu.sendCommand("set_whole_timing_map 520");
         chart = nextChart();
-        x = 328;
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_1);
 
         ecu.sendCommand("set_whole_timing_map 0");
         chart = nextChart();
-        x = 128;
         assertWaveNotNull(msg, chart, EngineChart.SPARK_1);
     }
 

unit_tests/main.cpp

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ GTEST_API_ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
 	 * See TEST_FROM_TRIGGER_ID to limit test just for last trigger
 	 */
 //	setVerboseTrigger(true);
+// --gtest_filter=*TEST_NAME*
 	//::testing::GTEST_FLAG(filter) = "*AllTriggersFixture*";
 	int result = RUN_ALL_TESTS();
 	// windows ERRORLEVEL in Jenkins batch file seems to want negative value to detect failure

unit_tests/tests/trigger/test_cam_vvt_input.cpp

@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ TEST(trigger, testNoisyInput) {
 TEST(trigger, testCamInput) {
 	// setting some weird engine
 	EngineTestHelper eth(engine_type_e::FORD_ESCORT_GT);
+	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::Unassigned;
 
 	// changing to 'ONE TOOTH' trigger on CRANK with CAM/VVT
 	setCrankOperationMode();

unit_tests/tests/trigger/test_quad_cam.cpp

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 TEST(trigger, testQuadCamInput) {
 	// setting some weird engine
 	EngineTestHelper eth(engine_type_e::FORD_ESCORT_GT);
+	engineConfiguration->triggerInputPins[1] = Gpio::Unassigned;
 	engineConfiguration->isFasterEngineSpinUpEnabled = false;
 	engineConfiguration->alwaysInstantRpm = true;
 

unit_tests/tests/trigger/test_trigger_decoder.cpp

@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ extern bool debugSignalExecutor;
 
 TEST(misc, testRpmCalculator) {
 	EngineTestHelper eth(engine_type_e::FORD_INLINE_6_1995);
+	efiAssertVoid(ObdCode::CUSTOM_ERR_6670, engineConfiguration!=NULL, "null config in engine");
 
 	setTable(config->injectionPhase, -180.0f);
 
@@ -190,8 +191,6 @@ TEST(misc, testRpmCalculator) {
 
 	ASSERT_EQ( 720,  engine->engineState.engineCycle) << "engineCycle";
 
-	efiAssertVoid(ObdCode::CUSTOM_ERR_6670, engineConfiguration!=NULL, "null config in engine");
-
 	engineConfiguration->minimumIgnitionTiming = -15;
 	float timingAdvance = -13;
 	setWholeTimingTable(timingAdvance);

unit_tests/tests/trigger/test_trigger_decoder_2.cpp

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static auto makeTriggerShape(operation_mode_e mode, const TriggerConfiguration&
 TEST(TriggerDecoder, FindsFirstSyncPoint) {
 	MockTriggerConfiguration cfg({trigger_type_e::TT_TOOTHED_WHEEL, 4, 1});
 	cfg.update();
+	engineConfiguration = nullptr;
 
 	auto shape = makeTriggerShape(FOUR_STROKE_CAM_SENSOR, cfg);