New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RPM correction/multiplier for Accel Enrich #4760
Comments
how much time do you spend at 7k rpm while below 30c coolant? |
no coolant just showed that to show what a 2D table looks like. Coolant would be replaced by RPM 4 cells, Coolant is now RPM. Left side is RPM, right side is Multiplier |
yes I understand the request - I'm asking why you think it's necessary |
adding 3ms on a transient at 5.500rpm usually just makes an engine lug you could be decelerating coming off a corner, mash the gas at 5.500 and if the TPS rate matches the same you'd see at idle, you'll get the same amount of fuel added |
oh duh the snip of a random table confused me |
Also, a CLT-based correction on enrich (more enrich added when colder) would also be good. Some ecus have a "Cold/Hot" temp, where the Hot temp is the normal, and the cold temp uses a multiplier. Example: (up to 100F, it uses 1.3 as a multiplier, then interpolates between 100F and 150F to become 1x multiplier.) |
@mck1117 @rusefillc any progress? |
add a 2D RPM correction table to transient enrich, to be able to lower the amount of enrich applied at upper RPMs (since engines in motion usually need much less enrichment).
A table like this
maybe even with 4 cells is enough. 1.0 at 1000RPM, .9 at 3000rpm, .5 at 5000RPM, 0 at 7000RPM.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: