Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

maximumIgnitionTiming does not account timing_offset_cylinder #5894

Open
rusefillc opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

maximumIgnitionTiming does not account timing_offset_cylinder #5894

rusefillc opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

Set timing_offset_cylinder for a funny engine like Harley

problem: ignition is messed up due to default minimumIgnitionTiming and maximumIgnitionTiming no longer making sense
desired: same -10 to 60 IgnitionTiming range is still producing proper results on HD

We have maximumIgnitionTiming and minimumIgnitionTiming safety feature which does not account odd file engine shapes as it probably should

timing_offset_cylinder = "I have a funny engine with cylinders not evenly spaced every 720 / N degrees". Offsets both ignition and fueling.

@rusefillc rusefillc added the bug label Jan 31, 2024
rusefillc pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2024
rusefillc pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2024
@mck1117
Copy link
Contributor

mck1117 commented Jan 31, 2024

Unless something is different on FOME, I'm not sure this is true. Clamping happens before adding the cylinder's offset, which includes both the offset in the firing order and the user-programmed cylinder offset.

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Unless something is different

it's definitely different

@rusefillc rusefillc changed the title maximumIgnitionTiming does not acccount timing_offset_cylinder maximumIgnitionTiming does not account timing_offset_cylinder Feb 7, 2024
rusefillc pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2024
rusefillc pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2024
rusefillc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
only: renaming field so that we do not have two entities with same name and different meaning
rusefillc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
rusefillc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
rusefillc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants