-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"]]" inside an expect
breaks updating
#20
Comments
Yeah… we should’t be adding a real Rust parser here, but it makes sense to make heuristic more robust to the practical cases. Here, I think it makes sense to verify that symbols before |
@matklad Interesting. I thought this would be the solution. Is this just to avoid a |
Allow tests to be updated automatically Uses the `expect-test` crate (thanks for the recommendation `@lnicola!)` to implement snapshot testing. `expect-test` is a bit more flexible than `insta`, so it seems like a good fit. This gives nicer diffs as well, since we don't strip whitespace prior to the comparison. Setting `UPDATE_EXPECT=1` before running `cargo test` will update all tests automatically. ## Blockers - [x] Omit empty lists from `Solution`'s `Display` impl. * `chalk` currently compares prefixes to make things less noisy, but that seems error prone anyways. * Harder than it seems at first, since you need to unintern to check whether a list is empty. - [x] Handle recursive/SLG comparisons better. * Many tests use `yields`, which compares the results of the two solvers against a known output. Unfortunately, the test macro will duplicate the `expect` invocation, so if neither output matches the expected one, `expect-test` will overwrite it *twice*, almost assuredly corrupting the test file. * There's many ways to fix this. ~~I've hacked around it here by adding a method to `Expect` (which is not yet upstream).~~ Most robust is to collect the various engine results first and only compare them against the output if they agree. *This is implemented now*. - [x] rust-analyzer/expect-test#20 ## Nice to haves - [x] Don't use raw strings with a hash unconditionally when blessing (rust-analyzer/expect-test#28). - [x] Shorter alias for `expect![[`? It's currently hard-coded into the `expect-test` crate (rust-analyzer/expect-test#26). - [ ] Remove newline escapes from existing tests.
The current code does a simple search for the character sequence
]]
to determine the end of anexpect![[
macro invocation. However,expect
takes a string, and "]]" is perfectly valid as part of a string.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: