Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade byteorder to 1.2 #199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 8, 2018

Conversation

tamasblummer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sgeisler
Copy link
Contributor

sgeisler commented Dec 7, 2018

How does one review an dependency upgrade? Since we aren't pinning dependencies (that should be done in applications) there is no sense in actually reviewing the dependency. As long as our tests still work it's ok I guess?

@tamasblummer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I do not know any other practically feasible criteria. In this case I need a feature of byteorder 1.2 (48bit integers) in Hammersbald, that is then used together with this library in bitcoin-spv. If this project would not move then it would force downstream projects to include several versions of the same lib. Best is not to have dependencies, but that is in many cases even more uneconomical.

@sgeisler sgeisler merged commit bc5f78c into rust-bitcoin:master Dec 8, 2018
Davidson-Souza pushed a commit to Davidson-Souza/rust-bitcoin that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
…bols

Fix typos in the external-symbols feature(bug)
yancyribbens pushed a commit to yancyribbens/rust-bitcoin that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants