Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tempararily pin fuzzer on rust 1.58 #848

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2022

Conversation

sanket1729
Copy link
Member

I think this might take a while to resolve and we should move ahead with
1.58. Looks like the fresh release of 1.59 added LLVM 13.0 that broke
some things.

I think this might take a while to resolve and we should move ahead with
1.58. Looks like the fresh release of 1.59 added LLVM 13.0 that broke
some things.
Copy link
Collaborator

@Kixunil Kixunil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 8016a85

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member Author

@tcharding @apoelstra can we merge this quickly? Something about red X on the open PRs is off-putting :P to me. And it will help move things forward.

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 8016a85

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit 45fe276 into rust-bitcoin:master Feb 26, 2022
@tcharding tcharding mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2022
apoelstra added a commit to rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
b0e078d Fix Fuzz CI at rust 1.58 (sanket1729)

Pull request description:

  Corollary to rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#848

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK b0e078d

Tree-SHA512: fd9ff7b8a0d833b82e30505c222b9b8697edc19c2335c6d4b25377b1d6ba9620c52e2ddb486b5f54c961fd0739a09a669008de447e7774e9698a2359f3d050d0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants