Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing 'standard' derives for Parity type #362

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tcharding
Copy link
Member

Recently we (cough Tobin) added a new type Parity and neglected to add the standard derive attributes. By 'standard' I took to mean the ones typical in rust-bitcoin and mentioned in the upcoming CONTIBUTING.md document for that project.

Recently we (*cough* Tobin) added a new type `Parity` and neglected to
add the standard derive attributes. By 'standard' I took to mean the
ones typical in `rust-bitcoin` and mentioned in the upcoming
`CONTIBUTING.md` document for that project.
@tcharding tcharding mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2022
@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Can you add a commit which bumps the minor version number?

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member

sanket1729 commented Jan 6, 2022

@apoelstra, @tcharding . This was already done in #361. But it might have been ignored because I did not have the proper title in PR description.

It also adds serde related derives(required for rust-bitcoin downstream) and does the minor version bump too.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

@sanket1729 oh! Thanks.

Yes, I did ignore the old title because it looked like the kind of thing that would take time to review :)

@apoelstra apoelstra closed this Jan 6, 2022
@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

(And in fact, I was wrong in reading the title ... I interpreted "wildcards" to mean something to do with miniscript keys, rather than rust imports ... so I shouldn't have expected it to be time-consuming.)

@tcharding tcharding deleted the parity-hot-fix branch January 11, 2022 04:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants