Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Rust on Espressif discovery journey #559

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SergioGasquez
Copy link

Hi! Since we at Espressif have something similar to the discovery books, but in a different format, I thought that it might be worth mentioning the resources in the discovery book.

If you want to keep this for the current content only, feel free to close the PR. Also, not sure if the format in which I added it, is the best, so also open to any suggestions!

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2024 08:46
@hdoordt
Copy link
Member

hdoordt commented May 13, 2024

This feels a bit out of place to me. I think a reference like this is more fit for an entry in Awesome Embedded Rust. Which, as it turns out, it already is

@sirhcel
Copy link
Contributor

sirhcel commented May 13, 2024

Wow, this got closed pretty fast. I would still advocate for including a reference in the Discovery Book for the following reasons:

  • At RustNL we discussed to cover sync and asnyc embedded Rust in the discovery book, so at least referring to the "second dimension" of of embedded Rust - no_std and std - feels natural to me
  • Especially the RISC-V devices offer a comfortable way of getting into embedded Rust and they are well supported and easily accessible targets
  • Awesome Embedded Rust is really broad and overwhelming for "young players" and I from my perspective these two points (std + sync, std + async) in the design space could and should be mentioned in the Discovery Book as well
  • Training resources are already available

Documentation and the Discovery Book is currently under discussion. What about discussing the if, how and where there as well?

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez reopened this May 14, 2024
@SergioGasquez
Copy link
Author

I guess Ill reopen it for others to jump in an give an opinion

Copy link
Member

@eldruin eldruin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I get this is slightly out of place because the relationship is not clear. We also do not link to the rust embedded book here (but maybe we should!). Otherwise this seems fine to me.
I think adding an "Alternatively" or similar word might be an improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants