Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(FilterOk): implement DoubleEndedIterator #948

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

Xenira
Copy link
Contributor

@Xenira Xenira commented May 27, 2024

Implemented DoubleEndedIterator for FilterOk

Refs: #947

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.48%. Comparing base (6814180) to head (d882491).
Report is 97 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #948      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.38%   94.48%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          48       49       +1     
  Lines        6665     7030     +365     
==========================================
+ Hits         6291     6642     +351     
- Misses        374      388      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Xenira
Copy link
Contributor Author

Xenira commented May 27, 2024

Added the rfold impl

Copy link
Member

@Philippe-Cholet Philippe-Cholet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good. Unless @phimuemue or @jswrenn think we should not make FilterOk double ended (and FilterMapOk), I'll merge this as is.

@phimuemue phimuemue added this pull request to the merge queue May 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into rust-itertools:master with commit 23bf81a May 27, 2024
13 checks passed
@Philippe-Cholet Philippe-Cholet added this to the next milestone May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants