-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement fmod #21
Labels
good first issue
Good for newcomers
Milestone
Comments
Merged
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 14, 2018
84: Implement fmod r=japaric a=P1n3appl3 closes #21 I replaced the `isnanf()` function from `fmodf()` with a call to the core function `is_nan()`. If there's a reason we needed to re-implement it then I can change that back. Also I couldn't figure out what to do in `src/lib.rs`. Is the `#[cfg(todo]` that I should be removing the one for `mod_euc()`? If so why is the equivalent one for the `f64` version still there? Co-authored-by: Joseph Ryan <josephryan3.14@gmail.com>
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 14, 2018
84: Implement fmod r=japaric a=P1n3appl3 closes #21 I replaced the `isnanf()` function from `fmodf()` with a call to the core function `is_nan()`. If there's a reason we needed to re-implement it then I can change that back. Also I couldn't figure out what to do in `src/lib.rs`. Is the `#[cfg(todo]` that I should be removing the one for `mod_euc()`? If so why is the equivalent one for the `f64` version still there? Co-authored-by: Joseph Ryan <josephryan3.14@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jorge Aparicio <jorge@japaric.io>
PR #84 implements this |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 14, 2018
84: Implement fmod r=japaric a=P1n3appl3 closes #21 I replaced the `isnanf()` function from `fmodf()` with a call to the core function `is_nan()`. If there's a reason we needed to re-implement it then I can change that back. Also I couldn't figure out what to do in `src/lib.rs`. Is the `#[cfg(todo]` that I should be removing the one for `mod_euc()`? If so why is the equivalent one for the `f64` version still there? Co-authored-by: Joseph Ryan <josephryan3.14@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jorge Aparicio <jorge@japaric.io>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Source: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/math/fmod.c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: