RFC: Minimum Supported Rust Version

text/0000-min-rust-version.md

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+the minimum version- Feature Name: min_rust_version
+- Start Date: 2018-06-28
+- RFC PR: (leave this empty)
+- Rust Issue: (leave this empty)
+
+# Summary
+[summary]: #summary
+
+Add `rust` field to the package section of `Cargo.toml` which will be used to
+specify crate's Minimum Supported Rust Version (MSRV):
+```toml
+[package]
+name = "foo"
+version = "0.1.0"
+rust = "1.30"
+```
+
+# Motivation
+[motivation]: #motivation
+
+Currently crates have no way to formally specify MSRV. As a result users can't
+check if crate can be built on their toolchain without building it. It also
+leads to the debate on how to handle crate version change on bumping MSRV,
+conservative approach is to consider such changes as breaking ones, which can
+hinder adoption of new features across ecosystem or result in version number
+inflation, which makes it harder to keep downstream crates up-to-date. More
+relaxed approach on another hand can result in broken crates for user of older
+compiler versions.
+
+# Guide-level explanation
+[guide-level-explanation]: #guide-level-explanation
+
+If you target a specific MSRV add a `rust` field to the `[package]` section of
+your `Cargo.toml` with a value equal to the targeted Rust version. If you build
+a crate with a dependency which has MSRV higher than the current version of your
+toolchain, `cargo` will return a compilation error stating the dependency and
+its MSRV. This behavior can be disabled by using `--no-msrv-check` flag.
+
+# Reference-level explanation
+[reference-level-explanation]: #reference-level-explanation
+
+During build process (including `run`, `test`, `benchmark`, `verify` and `publish`
+sub-commands) `cargo` will check MSRV requirements of all crates in a dependency
+tree scheduled to be built or checked. Crates which are part of the dependency
+tree, but will not be built are excluded from this check (e.g. target-dependent
+or optional crates).
+
+`rust` field should respect the following minimal requirements:
+- Value should be a version in semver format **without** range operators. Note
+that "1.50" is a valid value and implies "1.50.0".
+- Version can not be bigger than a current stable toolchain (it will be checked
+by crates.io during crate upload).
+- Version can not be smaller than 1.27 (version in which  `package.rust` field
+became a warning instead of an error).
+- Version can not be smaller than release version of a used edition, i.e.
+combination of `rust = "1.27"` and `edition = "2018"` is an invalid one.
+
+# Future work and extensions
+[future-work]: #future-work
+
+## Influencing version resolution
+
+The value of `rust` field (explicit or autmatically selected by `cargo`) will
+be used to select appropriate dependency versions.
+
+For example, let's imagine that your crate depends on crate `foo` with 10 published
+versions from `0.1.0` to `0.1.9`, in versions from `0.1.0` to `0.1.5` `rust`
+field in the `Cargo.toml` sent to crates.io equals to "1.30" and for others to
+"1.40". Now if you'll build your project with e.g. Rust 1.33, `cargo` will select
+`foo v0.1.5`. `foo v0.1.9` will be selected only if you'll build your project with
+Rust 1.40 or higher. But if you'll try to build your project with Rust 1.29 cargo
+will issue an error.
+
+`rust` field value will be checked as well. During crate build `cargo` will check
+if all upstream dependencies can be built with the specified MSRV. (i.e. it will
+check if there is exists solution for given crates and Rust versions constraints)
+Yanked crates will be ignored in this process.
+
+Implementing this functionality hopefully will allow us to close the long-standing
+debate regarding whether MSRV bump is a breaking change or not and will allow
+crate authors to feel less restrictive about bumping their crate's MSRV. (though
+it may be a usefull convention for post-1.0 crates to bump minor version on MSRV
+bump to allow publishing backports which fix serious issues using patch version)
+
+Note that described MSRV constraints and checks for dependency versions resolution
+can be disabled with the `--no-msrv-check` option.
+
+## Checking MSRV during publishing
+
+`cargo publish` will check that upload is done with a toolchain version specified
+in the `rust` field. If toolchain version is different, `cargo` will refuse to
+upload the crate. It will be a failsafe to prevent uses of incorrect `rust` values
+due to unintended MSRV bumps. This check can be disabled by using the exisiting
+`--no-verify` option.
+
+## Making `rust` field mandatory
+
+In future (probably in a next edition) we could make `rust` field mandatory for
+a newly uploaded crates. MSRV for older crates will be determined by the `edition`
+field. In other words `edition = "2018"` will imply `rust = "1.31"` and
+`edition = "2015"` will imply `rust = "1.0"`.
+
+`cargo init` will use version of a currently used toolchain.
+
+## `cfg`-based MSRVs
+
+Some crates can have different MSRVs depending on target architecture or enabled
+features. In such cases it can be usefull to describe how MSRV depends on them,
+e.g. in the following way:
+```toml
+[package]
+rust = "1.30"
+
+[target.x86_64-pc-windows-gnu]
+rust = "1.35"
+
+[target.'cfg(feature = "foo")']
+rust = "1.33"
+```
+
+All `rust` values in the `target` sections should be equal or bigger to a `rust` value
+specified in the `package` section.
+
+If target condition is true, then `cargo ` will use `rust` value from this section.
+If several target section conditions are true, then maximum value will be used.
+
+## Nightly and stable versions
+
+Some crates may prefer to target only the most recent stable or nightly toolchain.
+In addition to the versions we could allow `stable` and `nightly` values to declare
+that maintainers do not track MSRV for the crate.
+
+For some bleeding-edge crates which experience frequent breaks on Nightly updates
+(e.g. `rocket`) it can be useful to specify exact Nightly version(s) on which
+crate can be built. One way to achieve this is by using the following syntax:
+- auto-select: "nightly" This variant will behave in the same way as "stable", i.e.
+it will take a current nightly version and will use it in a "more or equal" constraint.
+- single version: "nightly: 2018-01-01" (tha main variant)
+- enumeration: "nightly: 2018-01-01, 2018-01-15"
+- semver-like conditions: "nightly: >=2018-01-01", "nightly: >=2018-01-01, <=2018-01-15",
+"nightly: >=2018-01-01, <=2018-01-15, 2018-01-20". (the latter is interpreted as
+"(version >= 2018-01-01 && version <= 2018-01-20) || version == 2018-01-20")
+
+Such restrictions can be quite severe, but hopefully this functionality will be
+used only by handful of crates.
+
+# Drawbacks
+[drawbacks]: #drawbacks
+
+- Declaration of MSRV, even with the checks, does not guarantee that crate
+will work correctly on the specified MSRV, only appropriate CI testing can do that.
+- More complex dependency versions resolution algorithm.
+- MSRV selected by `cargo publish` with `rust = "stable"` can be too
+conservative.
+
+# Rationale and Alternatives
+[alternatives]: #alternatives
+
+- Automatically calculate MSRV.
+- Do nothing and rely on [LTS releases](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2483)
+for bumping crate MSRVs.
+
+# Prior art
+[prior-art]: #prior-art
+
+Previous proposals:
+- [RFC 1707](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1707)
+- [RFC 1709](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1709)
+- [RFC 1953](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1953)
+- [RFC 2182](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2182) (arguably this one got off-track)
+
+# Unresolved questions
+[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions
+
+- Name bike-shedding: `rust` vs `rustc` vs `min-rust-version`
+- Additional checks?
+- Better description of versions resolution algorithm.
+- How nightly versions will work with "cfg based MSRV"?