Render matched macro arm on hover of macro calls #16057
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #16145) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Veykril
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
Not too happy with how we render it in hover right now (the hover acction would make more sense), but I don't want to spend the time on that right now. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced May 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4028, its a different take on the idea. I don't like go to being changed here simply because we can't point the focus range on the name anymore as we usually do, and some editors might use this feature (and the focus range) for certain other things. We could instead add a new hover action for this to move to the arm directly (or maybe make
go to implementationjump to the arm?)