Fix incorrect symbol definitions in SCIP output #17988
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
davidbarsky
reviewed
Aug 28, 2024
|
What a coincidence |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The SCIP output incorrectly marks some symbols as definitions because it doesn't account for the file ID when comparing the token's range to its definition's range.
This means that if a symbol is referenced in a file at the same position at which it is defined in another file, that reference will be marked as a definition. I was quite surprised by how common this is. For example,
PartialEqis defined here anduuidreferences it here. And what do you know, they're both at offset 10083! In our large monorepo, this happens for basically every common stdlib type!