Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the inlined_generics lint. #10650

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add the inlined_generics lint. #10650

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

JohnBobbo96
Copy link

@JohnBobbo96 JohnBobbo96 commented Apr 16, 2023

Add the inlined_generics lint, which lints generic functions/methods that are marked #[inline] or #[inline(always)], as doing so can possibly increase compilation times, because the compiler will monomorphize all generic functions per crate as well as recompiling a function marked #[inline] or #[inline(always)] per CGU. See also this comment as well as this comment for some more information.

changelog: new lint: [inlined_generics]

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @flip1995 (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Apr 16, 2023
functions/methods with generics which are also marked
either `#[inline]` or `#[inline(always)]`.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 23, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #10578) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@flip1995 flip1995 added S-inactive-closed Status: Closed due to inactivity and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-inactive-closed Status: Closed due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants