Who should review new PRs? #137
Comments
I'm happy to help maintain since libc CI also uses this crate and I'm also interested in the updates :) |
@Xanewok i'm happy for you and ilya to be reviewing, and y'all can choose additional reviewers if you'd like. |
@JohnTitor you should now have bors review permissions as per rust-lang/team#486 🙂 |
@Xanewok Thanks! Feel free to r? or ping me if a review is needed :) |
Semi-related to this: It'd be great if the reviewers also have permission on the repo. I currently cannot edit/close PRs/issues like #177 :( |
@pietroalbini is it possible to do this via rust-lang/team? |
@Xanewok has admin rights on the repo and can add others for edit/triage access, fwiw |
Oh right, thanks. @JohnTitor can you see if you have access to triage features? |
@Xanewok Yep, thanks! |
Currently, reviewing is done by me and sometimes @Xanewok, closing. |
In an effort to streamline reviewing, this repository was moved to the rust-lang organization (from legacy the rust-dev-tools one) in order to use the
@bors
bot (similar to other repos under rust-lang org). While this should be now complete, there remains a question who should be reviewing the PRs 😅@Manishearth has helped me as an interim reviewer but we discussed on Discord that it'd be good to establish others instead as reviewers.
@ibabushkin @gnzlbg @JohnTitor do you have time and would like to review any new PRs? If not, do you have an idea who could?
Disclaimer: I'm trying to integrate semverver into https://github.com/paritytech/cargo-unleash for automatic workspace package publishing, hence why I'm interested in refreshing semverver a bit 🙂
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: