You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the different collections are named after the implementation (RingBuf or BinaryHeap) and not the concept they implement (double ended queue or priority queue).
In some explanations of ring buffers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_buffer) it is defined that adding elements to a full ring buffer leads to overwrite of elements. This seems not to be the case here.
Therefore I would suggest to change the introduction of the ring buffer documentation to:
RingBuf is a double- ended queue, which is implemented with the help of a growing circular buffer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the different collections are named after the implementation (RingBuf or BinaryHeap) and not the concept they implement (double ended queue or priority queue).
In some explanations of ring buffers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_buffer) it is defined that adding elements to a full ring buffer leads to overwrite of elements. This seems not to be the case here.
Therefore I would suggest to change the introduction of the ring buffer documentation to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: