Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upRegression on beta: three dots in a trait leads to an infinite loop(?) #32446
Comments
nodakai
added a commit
to nodakai/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2016
nodakai
referenced this issue
Mar 23, 2016
Merged
Remove ungrammatical dots from the error index. #32447
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Rustdoc not only falls into an infinite loop but also consumes infinitely growing amount of memory (only) when the bad trait with dots is surrounded by definitions:
This must have caused the Travis failure in #31689 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I don't think this is about inclusive ranges. |
alexcrichton
added
the
regression-from-stable-to-beta
label
Mar 23, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
triage: I-nominated |
rust-highfive
added
the
I-nominated
label
Mar 23, 2016
alexcrichton
added
the
T-compiler
label
Mar 23, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
cc @nrc |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
triage: P-high |
rust-highfive
added
P-high
and removed
I-nominated
labels
Mar 24, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
My guess is that we are trying to recover from an invalid token but forgetting to |
eddyb
self-assigned this
Mar 24, 2016
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2016
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2016
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2016
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2016
bors
closed this
in
#32479
Mar 29, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
nodakai commentedMar 23, 2016
(Yes, just a single line.)
Possibly related to #32245 ?
Like #32445 , it was found during
make check-docs. One doctest contained three dots probably just to mean some codes had been omitted.