Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upAdd LaTeX support to Rustdoc #34261
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
rkruppe
Jun 13, 2016
Contributor
Is there a common markdown extension syntax for Latex expressions? Hopefully we won't stay on hoedown forever (cf. #33771) and the surface syntax should remain the same when replacing hoedown.
|
Is there a common markdown extension syntax for Latex expressions? Hopefully we won't stay on hoedown forever (cf. #33771) and the surface syntax should remain the same when replacing hoedown. |
AndrewBrinker
closed this
Oct 5, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ghost
Oct 13, 2016
@AndrewBrinker Curious why you closed this?
Speaking broadly, if Rust wants to be a major systems language, supporting linear algebra/signal processing applications is on the table. It already does that pretty well as a language construct, but it's exceedingly incongruous in this day and age that the docs don't.
Speaking specifically, I want to document this digital filter library I just made properly.
So I think there's a real use case here
ghost
commented
Oct 13, 2016
|
@AndrewBrinker Curious why you closed this? Speaking broadly, if Rust wants to be a major systems language, supporting linear algebra/signal processing applications is on the table. It already does that pretty well as a language construct, but it's exceedingly incongruous in this day and age that the docs don't. Speaking specifically, I want to document this digital filter library I just made properly. So I think there's a real use case here |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Oh, I didn't mean to close this! |
AndrewBrinker
reopened this
Oct 13, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
masonium
Nov 4, 2016
Just to put in
I'm currently working on a linear algebra library, and documentation without LaTeX is pretty painful.
I would definitely be willing to take this on in rustdoc, though this would be my first foray into the rust codebase itself.
masonium
commented
Nov 4, 2016
|
Just to put in I'm currently working on a linear algebra library, and documentation without LaTeX is pretty painful. I would definitely be willing to take this on in rustdoc, though this would be my first foray into the rust codebase itself. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Mark-Simulacrum
May 15, 2017
Member
I am going to close this. This is a fairly large feature request, and in my opinion needs an RFC or at least some discussion on internals.rust-lang.org. Please open a thread there if you're actively interested!
|
I am going to close this. This is a fairly large feature request, and in my opinion needs an RFC or at least some discussion on internals.rust-lang.org. Please open a thread there if you're actively interested! |
AndrewBrinker commentedJun 13, 2016
This has been discussed before (#17390 and #16300), but it's been a while since then, and may be worth discussing.
There are a number of options for implementing LaTeX in the browser. I believe KaTeX remains the most efficient option, and is probably the one we should go with, but if I'm wrong or if people have strong feelings in support of another option we can try something else.
I am happy to make this happen if it's something people want.