#[doc(inline)] has no effect on reexported derive macros #58696
Comments
nox
added
the
T-rustdoc
jonas-schievink
added
A-macros
|
This also applies to non-derive proc_macros. |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2019
…final, r=petrochenkov Improve Rustdoc's handling of procedural macros Fixes rust-lang#58700 Fixes rust-lang#58696 Fixes rust-lang#49553 Fixes rust-lang#52210 This commit removes the special rustdoc handling for proc macros, as we can now retrieve their span and attributes just like any other item. A new command-line option is added to rustdoc: `--crate-type`. This takes the same options as rustc's `--crate-type` option. However, all values other than `proc-macro` are treated the same. This allows Rustdoc to enable 'proc macro mode' when handling a proc macro crate. In compiletest, a new 'rustdoc-flags' option is added. This allows us to pass in the '--proc-macro-crate' flag in the absence of Cargo. I've opened [an additional PR to Cargo](rust-lang/cargo#7159) to support passing in this flag. These two PRS can be merged in any order - the Cargo changes will not take effect until the 'cargo' submodule is updated in this repository.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2019
…final, r=petrochenkov Improve Rustdoc's handling of procedural macros Fixes rust-lang#58700 Fixes rust-lang#58696 Fixes rust-lang#49553 Fixes rust-lang#52210 This commit removes the special rustdoc handling for proc macros, as we can now retrieve their span and attributes just like any other item. A new command-line option is added to rustdoc: `--crate-type`. This takes the same options as rustc's `--crate-type` option. However, all values other than `proc-macro` are treated the same. This allows Rustdoc to enable 'proc macro mode' when handling a proc macro crate. In compiletest, a new 'rustdoc-flags' option is added. This allows us to pass in the '--proc-macro-crate' flag in the absence of Cargo. I've opened [an additional PR to Cargo](rust-lang/cargo#7159) to support passing in this flag. These two PRS can be merged in any order - the Cargo changes will not take effect until the 'cargo' submodule is updated in this repository.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2019
…trochenkov Improve Rustdoc's handling of procedural macros Fixes #58700 Fixes #58696 Fixes #49553 Fixes #52210 This commit removes the special rustdoc handling for proc macros, as we can now retrieve their span and attributes just like any other item. A new command-line option is added to rustdoc: `--crate-type`. This takes the same options as rustc's `--crate-type` option. However, all values other than `proc-macro` are treated the same. This allows Rustdoc to enable 'proc macro mode' when handling a proc macro crate. In compiletest, a new 'rustdoc-flags' option is added. This allows us to pass in the '--proc-macro-crate' flag in the absence of Cargo. I've opened [an additional PR to Cargo](rust-lang/cargo#7159) to support passing in this flag. These two PRS can be merged in any order - the Cargo changes will not take effect until the 'cargo' submodule is updated in this repository.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Everything is in the title,
#[doc(inline)] pub use foo_derive::Foo;does not inlineFoo's documentation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: