Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC 2203 not implemented inside a const block #65732

Closed
ecstatic-morse opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #66642
Closed

RFC 2203 not implemented inside a const block #65732

ecstatic-morse opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #66642
Assignees
Labels
A-const-eval Area: constant evaluation (mir interpretation) B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. C-bug Category: This is a bug. requires-nightly This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@ecstatic-morse
Copy link
Contributor

ecstatic-morse commented Oct 23, 2019

Thanks to RFC 2203, code like the following compiles on nightly:

fn main() {
    let _: [Option<Box<i32>>; 4] = [None; 4];
}

However, as pointed out by @RalfJung, the same code fails to compile in a const block (Playground):

const _: [Option<Box<i32>>; 4] = [None; 4];

Currently, there's two distinct implementations for promotion of temps, one for fn and const fn and one for const and static. RFC 2203 is implemented for the first but not the second.

I didn't see an actual issue for this. I'll close this as a dupe if @RalfJung already opened one.

cc #49147

@ecstatic-morse ecstatic-morse added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. C-bug Category: This is a bug. A-const-eval Area: constant evaluation (mir interpretation) labels Oct 23, 2019
@ecstatic-morse ecstatic-morse self-assigned this Oct 23, 2019
@Centril Centril added the requires-nightly This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. label Oct 24, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2019
…error, r=ecstatic-morse

suggest `const_in_array_repeat_expression` flag

This PR adds a suggestion to add the `#![feature(const_in_array_repeat_expression)]` attribute to the crate when a promotable expression is used in a repeat expression and the feature gate is not enabled.

Unfortunately, this ended up being a little bit more complex than I anticipated, which may not have been worth it given that this would all be removed when the feature is stabilized. However, with rust-lang#65732 and rust-lang#65737 being open, and the feature gate having not been being suggested to potential users, the feature might not be stabilized in a while, so maybe this is worth landing.

cc @Centril (addresses [this comment](rust-lang#61749 (comment)))
r? @ecstatic-morse (opened issues related to RFC 2203 recently)
@bors bors closed this as completed in bbb664a Nov 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-const-eval Area: constant evaluation (mir interpretation) B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. C-bug Category: This is a bug. requires-nightly This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants