Rollup of 7 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Initial version of 1.64 release notes #101093 (Initial version of 1.64 release notes)
• change AccessLevels representation #101713 (change AccessLevels representation)
• Bump Unicode to version 15.0.0, regenerate tables #101821 (Bump Unicode to version 15.0.0, regenerate tables)
• Enforce "joined()" and "joined_with_noop()" test #101826 (Enforce "joined()" and "joined_with_noop()" test)
• Allow using vendoring when running bootstrap from outside the source root #101835 (Allow using vendoring when running bootstrap from outside the source root)
• Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot" #101942 (Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot")
• rustdoc: remove unused CSS .non-exhaustive { margin-bottom } #101943 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS .non-exhaustive { margin-bottom })

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

[bors]

📌 Commit 5ba52ca has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 5ba52ca with merge 5253b0a...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 5253b0a to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#101943	e10233649b5cd0a1cb62f754443e11d538a2b509
#101942	be5b958cb9b64105e5fbb730f3d99bd5f118a50f
#101835	7427f7872edb2008c308aadeb24cd5718530737c
#101826	33f31d3333ab21093997743861d7b08f9cb1ee96
#101821	d6a34205dcc821736ec459e2ee3b006da581692b
#101713	d0df9352555c4c4ffceae937ca5d786256f03e32
#101093	bb7cf68141ec84dfed9b2217c5ad80140e4106a7

previous master: 98ad6a5519

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (5253b0a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.8%	[0.2%, 3.5%]	15
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.4%	[-1.6%, -1.3%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.7%	[0.9%, 2.3%]	8
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.0%, 2.7%]	8
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-2.8%, -2.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.7%	[0.9%, 2.3%]	8

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩² ↩³

2. number of relevant changes ↩ ↩² ↩³

[lqd]

@rust-timer build d0df9352555c4c4ffceae937ca5d786256f03e32

[rust-timer]

Queued d0df9352555c4c4ffceae937ca5d786256f03e32 with parent 98ad6a5, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (d0df9352555c4c4ffceae937ca5d786256f03e32): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.8%	[0.2%, 3.4%]	14
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.6%	[-1.7%, -1.5%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩² ↩³

2. number of relevant changes ↩ ↩² ↩³

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@rust-timer build d6a34205dcc821736ec459e2ee3b006da581692b

[rust-timer]

Queued d6a34205dcc821736ec459e2ee3b006da581692b with parent 98ad6a5, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (d6a34205dcc821736ec459e2ee3b006da581692b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.8%	[0.8%, 0.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	6.1%	[5.2%, 7.3%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.9%	[-3.5%, -2.3%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.8%	[0.8%, 0.8%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean1	range	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩²

2. number of relevant changes ↩ ↩²