Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document more settings for building rustc for Fuchsia #104465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 29, 2022

Conversation

djkoloski
Copy link
Contributor

This documents that you need to link for Fuchsia with lld and provides configuration settings for both clang and lld. It also adjusts the documentation for running the test suite to recommend installing to a prefix.

r? @tmandry

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 15, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 16, 2022
config-env.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/fuchsia.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/fuchsia.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/fuchsia.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@djkoloski
Copy link
Contributor Author

The "empty file" change for the test runner script is actually it being set to executable.

@tmandry
Copy link
Member

tmandry commented Nov 28, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2022

📌 Commit 9ed2977 has been approved by tmandry

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022
…docs, r=tmandry

Document more settings for building rustc for Fuchsia

This documents that you need to link for Fuchsia with `lld` and provides configuration settings for both `clang` and `lld`. It also adjusts the documentation for running the test suite to recommend installing to a prefix.

r? `@tmandry`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104465 (Document more settings for building rustc for Fuchsia)
 - rust-lang#104951 (Simplify checking for `GeneratorKind::Async`)
 - rust-lang#104959 (Revert rust-lang#104269 (to avoid spurious hang/test failure in CI))
 - rust-lang#104978 (notify the rust-analyzer team on changes to the rust-analyzer subtree)
 - rust-lang#105010 (Fix documentation of asymptotic complexity for rustc_data_structures::SortedMap)
 - rust-lang#105016 (Add sentence when rustdoc search is running)
 - rust-lang#105020 (rustdoc: merge background-image rules in rustdoc-toggle CSS)
 - rust-lang#105024 (rustdoc: remove `fnname` CSS class that's styled exactly like `fn`)
 - rust-lang#105027 (Rustdoc-Json: Add tests for linking to foreign variants.)
 - rust-lang#105038 (Clean up pr 104954)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8bcb473 into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 29, 2022
@tmandry tmandry added the O-fuchsia Operating system: Fuchsia label May 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-fuchsia Operating system: Fuchsia S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants