use the correct Reveal during validation
#105455
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
This PR changes MIR cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras |
lcnr
changed the title
Reveal during validation.Reveal during validation
lcnr
force-pushed
the
correct-reveal-in-validate
branch
from
b0485d5
to
3d9641e
Compare
lcnr
force-pushed
the
correct-reveal-in-validate
branch
from
3d9641e
to
e73ef59
Compare
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105216 (Remove unused GUI test) - rust-lang#105245 (attempt to clarify align_to docs) - rust-lang#105387 (Improve Rustdoc scrape-examples UI) - rust-lang#105389 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64le-linux) - rust-lang#105427 (Dont silently ignore rustdoc errors) - rust-lang#105442 (rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS) - rust-lang#105443 (Move some queries and methods) - rust-lang#105455 (use the correct `Reveal` during validation) - rust-lang#105470 (Clippy: backport ICE fix before beta branch) - rust-lang#105474 (lib docs: fix typo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
…=jackh726 use the correct `Reveal` during validation supersedes rust-lang#105454. Deals with rust-lang#105009 (comment), not closing rust-lang#105009 as the ICE may leak into beta The issue was the following: - we optimize the mir, using `Reveal::All` - some optimization relies on the hidden type of an opaque type - we then validate using `Reveal::UserFacing` again which is not able to observe the hidden type r? `@jackh726`
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105216 (Remove unused GUI test) - rust-lang#105245 (attempt to clarify align_to docs) - rust-lang#105387 (Improve Rustdoc scrape-examples UI) - rust-lang#105389 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64le-linux) - rust-lang#105427 (Dont silently ignore rustdoc errors) - rust-lang#105442 (rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS) - rust-lang#105443 (Move some queries and methods) - rust-lang#105455 (use the correct `Reveal` during validation) - rust-lang#105470 (Clippy: backport ICE fix before beta branch) - rust-lang#105474 (lib docs: fix typo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
supersedes #105454. Deals with #105009 (comment), not closing #105009 as the ICE may leak into beta
The issue was the following:
Reveal::AllReveal::UserFacingagain which causes us to use the opaque type again, e.g. fromfn_sig, causing a type error when relating it with the hidden type.r? @jackh726