Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #108771

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Mar 5, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #108771

merged 16 commits into from Mar 5, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jyn514 and others added 16 commits March 1, 2023 10:49
This was added to in 2019 to speed up rebuild times when LLVM was
modified. Now that download-ci-llvm exists, I don't think it makes sense
to support an unsound option like this that can lead to miscompiles; and
the code cleanup is nice too.
Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
- Switch from `walkdir` to `ignore`. This required various changes to
  make `skip` thread-safe.
- Ignore `build` anywhere in the source tree, not just at the top-level.
  We support this in bootstrap, we should support it in tidy too.

As a nice side benefit, this also makes tidy a bit faster.

Before:
```
; hyperfine -i '"/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"'
Benchmark 1: "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"
  Time (mean ± σ):      1.080 s ±  0.008 s    [User: 2.616 s, System: 3.243 s]
  Range (min … max):    1.069 s …  1.099 s    10 runs
```

After:
```
; hyperfine '"/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"'
Benchmark 1: "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"
  Time (mean ± σ):     705.0 ms ±   1.4 ms    [User: 3179.1 ms, System: 1517.5 ms]
  Range (min … max):   702.3 ms … 706.9 ms    10 runs
```
`WalkBuilder` handles top-level paths differently than `fn walk` used
to: it doesn't run the `skip` function to determine if it should be
skipped, instead assuming the top-level function is always included.

This is a reasonable assumption; adapt our code so it doesn't make
pointless calls to `walk`.
Ignore files in .gitignore in tidy

- Switch from `walkdir` to `ignore`. This required various changes to make `skip` thread-safe.
- Ignore `build` anywhere in the source tree, not just at the top-level. We support this in bootstrap, we should support it in tidy too.

As a nice side benefit, this also makes tidy a bit faster.

Before:
```
; hyperfine -i '"/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"'
Benchmark 1: "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"
  Time (mean ± σ):      1.080 s ±  0.008 s    [User: 2.616 s, System: 3.243 s]
  Range (min … max):    1.069 s …  1.099 s    10 runs
```

After:
```
; hyperfine '"/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"'
Benchmark 1: "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rust-tidy" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/home/gh-jyn514/rust2/build" "32"
  Time (mean ± σ):     705.0 ms ±   1.4 ms    [User: 3179.1 ms, System: 1517.5 ms]
  Range (min … max):   702.3 ms … 706.9 ms    10 runs
```

r? `@the8472`
…ulacrum

Remove `llvm.skip-rebuild` option

This was added to in 2019 to speed up rebuild times when LLVM was modified. Now that download-ci-llvm exists, I don't think it makes sense to support an unsound option like this that can lead to miscompiles; and the code cleanup is nice too.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` cc `@varkor` rust-lang#65612
Sync codegen defaults with compiler defaults and add a ping message so they stay in sync

Looks like this got missed in rust-lang#107241.
Rename `src/etc/vscode_settings.json` to `rust_analyzer_settings.json`

Fixes rust-lang#108614
…aDotInTheVoid

rustdoc-json: switch from HashMap to FxHashMap to fix non-determinism

Using `HashMap` in `rustdoc_json_types::Crate` were causing creating randomly ordered objects in the json doc files. Which might cause problems to people who are doing comparison on those files specially in CI pipelines. See rust-lang#103785 (comment)

This PR fixes that issue and extends the coverage of `tests/run-make/rustdoc-verify-output-files` testing ability.
…rs-bad-copy-clone, r=jackh726

Don't ICE when encountering bound var in builtin copy/clone bounds

Fixes rust-lang#108742
…-tester, r=notriddle

Clean up rustdoc-js tester.js file

A much needed cleanup.

r? `@notriddle`
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 5, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2023

📌 Commit 5219616 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 5, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 5219616 with merge 04e9575...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 04e9575 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 5, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 04e9575 into rust-lang:master Mar 5, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 5, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#108749 5a2be9aca7f0376dc3ff4e9989539531edba71de
#108744 f7d3a0d51d3624e63f0c2c9b5f71e58c9c6415e5
#108626 3d357e45afc11cee777d1df961add8bfb612c685
#108618 21b90ebde7a9e8c18ec9d4454e6f91cdb79573d1
#108616 eaf7edea38db1a60662a1f996faa4c5e3d893e63
#108613 b799e06d4314f138518a70c16417e6b2255274f3
#106440 5447f72d43644e95d04373d93084a61254b64105

previous master: 0d439f8181

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (04e9575): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-0.9%, -0.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.9% [-0.9%, -0.9%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-whlvo2g branch March 16, 2024 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants