mv tests/codegen/issue-* tests/codegen/issues/

[scottmcm]

No changes to the contents; just a move.

Like how there's a https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/issues folder.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[WaffleLapkin]

r? @WaffleLapkin
@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 6e1ab1d has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[matthiaskrgr]

failed in #109205
@bors r- rollup=never

[w-flo]

static_dllimport_aux.rs probably needs to move from tests/codegen/auxiliary to test/codegen/issues/auxiliary, too.

[WaffleLapkin]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 053cde3db3cb379aa17a678421980356a015cb4a has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 053cde3db3cb379aa17a678421980356a015cb4a with merge 05a655fd1e3611a50bb35e532f0fe1e148140e04...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[ehuss]

@bors retry
wasm32 SIGSEGV

[WaffleLapkin]

I think this is the LLVM update failure? LLVM update was reverted in #109326, so I guess a rebase should fix CI.

[WaffleLapkin]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 48011e2 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[Nilstrieb]

@bors rollup=iffy
the queue is really full

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 48011e2 with merge cf81181...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: WaffleLapkin
Pushing cf81181 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (cf81181): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.7%, -0.6%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.6%, -0.4%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.7%, -0.6%]	4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[0.4%, 1.6%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.0%	[-3.0%, -3.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.7%	[-2.8%, -0.4%]	12
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.0%	[-3.0%, -3.0%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.6%, -0.4%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0