Implement owned ops for HashSet and BTreeSet
#109402
Open
+257
−36
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
WaffleLapkin
added
A-collections
workingjubilee
added
the
needs-fcp
dtolnay
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2023
|
@rust-lang/libs-api: This adds the following binary operator impls shown in bold below. There is a pre-existing more restrictive impl corresponding to each one; the additional bounds required by the pre-existing impls are noted below. All of the following require
All of the following require
|
|
Team member @dtolnay has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
rfcbot
added
proposed-final-comment-period
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
Add `minmax{,_by,_by_key}` functions to `core::cmp`
This PR adds the following functions:
```rust
// mod core::cmp
#![unstable(feature = "cmp_minmax")]
pub fn minmax<T>(v1: T, v2: T) -> [T; 2]
where
T: Ord;
pub fn minmax_by<T, F>(v1: T, v2: T, compare: F) -> [T; 2]
where
F: FnOnce(&T, &T) -> Ordering;
pub fn minmax_by_key<T, F, K>(v1: T, v2: T, mut f: F) -> [T; 2]
where
F: FnMut(&T) -> K,
K: Ord;
```
(they are also `const` under `#[feature(const_cmp)]`, I've omitted `const` stuff for simplicity/readability)
----
Semantically these functions are equivalent to `{ let mut arr = [v1, v2]; arr.sort(); arr }`, but since they operate on 2 elements only, they are implemented as a single comparison.
Even though that's basically a sort, I think "sort 2 elements" operation is useful on it's own in many cases. Namely, it's a common pattern when you have 2 things, and need to know which one is smaller/bigger to operate on them differently.
I've wanted such functions countless times, most recently in rust-lang#109402, so I thought I'd propose them.
----
r? libs-api
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#109409 - WaffleLapkin:progamer, r=dtolnay Add `minmax{,_by,_by_key}` functions to `core::cmp` This PR adds the following functions: ```rust // mod core::cmp #![unstable(feature = "cmp_minmax")] pub fn minmax<T>(v1: T, v2: T) -> [T; 2] where T: Ord; pub fn minmax_by<T, F>(v1: T, v2: T, compare: F) -> [T; 2] where F: FnOnce(&T, &T) -> Ordering; pub fn minmax_by_key<T, F, K>(v1: T, v2: T, mut f: F) -> [T; 2] where F: FnMut(&T) -> K, K: Ord; ``` (they are also `const` under `#[feature(const_cmp)]`, I've omitted `const` stuff for simplicity/readability) ---- Semantically these functions are equivalent to `{ let mut arr = [v1, v2]; arr.sort(); arr }`, but since they operate on 2 elements only, they are implemented as a single comparison. Even though that's basically a sort, I think "sort 2 elements" operation is useful on it's own in many cases. Namely, it's a common pattern when you have 2 things, and need to know which one is smaller/bigger to operate on them differently. I've wanted such functions countless times, most recently in rust-lang#109402, so I thought I'd propose them. ---- r? libs-api
|
It's going to be a small but weird asymmetry and an ergonomics papercut if some operators can take owned arguments and others cannot. Adding all the combinations would also fix the issue that code like |
dtolnay
added
S-waiting-on-fcp
WaffleLapkin
removed
the
needs-fcp
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements
ops::{BitAnd, BitOr, BitXor, Sub}where one, or both arguments are owned (previously we only had impls for references to sets).The main advantage of these impls is lifted
T: Clonebounds (and, in case ofHashSet, liftedS: Default). The secondary one is being able to reuse allocations. Lastly, they may (or may not) be more performant.Added public APIs (insta-stable):
I only added the "important" impls, i.e. such that allow lifting the bounds. Thus union-like ops (or, xor) have both arguments owned (because they need elements from both sets), while difference-like ops (sub, and) have only
selfowned (that's sufficient to not clone elements).Other potentially interesting implementations (in the order of most to least interesting according to myself):
BitAnd<Set<T, ...>> for Set<T, ...>— optimization potential (can keep either allocation/iterate either set)BitOr<&Set<T, ...>> for Set<T, ...>andBitOr<&Set<T, ...>> for Set<T, ...>— still requireT: Clone, but can keep the allocation/hasherBitOr<Set<T, ...>> for &Set<T, ...>andBitOr<Set<T, ...>> for &Set<T, ...>could be added for completenessBitAnd<Set<T, ...>> for &Set<T, ...>— symmetry for completenessSub<Set<T, ...>> for Set<T, ...>andSub<Set<T, ...>> for &Set<T, ...>— completeness (no bounds lifting/optimization gains)r? libs-api