Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #111933

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 25, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #111933

merged 8 commits into from
May 25, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

daxpedda and others added 8 commits April 3, 2023 18:01
Add slice::{split_,}{first,last}_chunk{,_mut}

This adds to the existing tracking issue for `slice::array_chunks` (rust-lang#74985) under a separate feature, `slice_get_chunk`.

Currently, we have the existing `first`/`last` API for slices:

```rust
impl [T] {
    pub const fn first(&self) -> Option<&T>;
    pub const fn first_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
    pub const fn last(&self) -> Option<&T>;
    pub const fn last_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
    pub const fn split_first(&self) -> Option<(&T, &[T])>;
    pub const fn split_first_mut(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut T, &mut [T])>;
    pub const fn split_last(&self) -> Option<(&T, &[T])>;
    pub const fn split_last_mut(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut T, &mut [T])>;
}
```

This augments it with a `first_chunk`/`last_chunk` API that allows retrieving multiple elements at once:

```rust
impl [T] {
    pub const fn first_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<&[T; N]>;
    pub const fn first_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<&mut [T; N]>;
    pub const fn last_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<&[T; N]>;
    pub const fn last_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<&mut [T; N]>;
    pub const fn split_first_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<(&[T; N], &[T])>;
    pub const fn split_first_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut [T; N], &mut [T])>;
    pub const fn split_last_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<(&[T; N], &[T])>;
    pub const fn split_last_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut [T; N], &mut [T])>;
}
```

The code is based off of a copy of the existing API, with the documentation and examples properly modified. Currently, the most common way to perform these kinds of lookups with the existing methods is via `slice.as_chunks::<N>().0[0]` or the worse `slice.as_chunks::<N>().0[slice.len() - N]`, which is substantially less readable than `slice.first_chunk::<N>()` or `slice.last_chunk::<N>()`.

ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#69
Use apple-m1 as target CPU for aarch64-apple-darwin.

This updates the target CPU for the `aarch64-apple-darwin` target to `apple-m1`, which is the first generation of CPUs with this target anyway.

This wasn't able to be done before because of the minimum supported version of LLVM being 12, now that it was updated to 13 (in fact we are already at 14), this is available.

See previous update: rust-lang#90478.
See LLVM update: rust-lang#100460.
…rn, r=petrochenkov

Emit diagnostic for privately uninhabited uncovered witnesses.

Fixes rust-lang#104034

cc `@Nadrieril`
…trieb

Don't leak the function that is called on drop

It probably wasn't causing problems anyway, but still, a `// this leaks, please don't pass anything that owns memory` is not sustainable.

I could implement a version which does not require `Option`, but it would require `unsafe`, at which point it's probably not worth it.
@rustbot rustbot added A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 25, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

📌 Commit a9743e1 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 25, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a9743e1 with merge 0b011b7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 0b011b7 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 25, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 0b011b7 into rust-lang:master May 25, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 25, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#111875 407e70b87c9eee2fb55774f2f9c2ae07204de9d1
#111624 b2df69b40f743ede2cbb3f16b235f374e8240186
#109899 fda52502bac6b150d0b868b0b1e9f2d35ba1ef1b
#95198 da9eed00269a2be2f4759965e1483e0df4579c45

previous master: 776f22292f

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0b011b7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [2.5%, 2.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [2.5%, 2.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.0% [0.0%, 0.0%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [0.0%, 0.0%] 1

Bootstrap: 646.814s -> 646.729s (-0.01%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-m10k3ts branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants