Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak CGU order. #111937

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 25, 2023
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 25, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

⌛ Trying commit b175437 with merge a37296b9a5a94ca1609a95e2250d1ae11fcc6125...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a37296b9a5a94ca1609a95e2250d1ae11fcc6125 (a37296b9a5a94ca1609a95e2250d1ae11fcc6125)

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a37296b9a5a94ca1609a95e2250d1ae11fcc6125 (a37296b9a5a94ca1609a95e2250d1ae11fcc6125)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a37296b9a5a94ca1609a95e2250d1ae11fcc6125): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
5.1% [2.5%, 7.7%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.0% [2.1%, 3.7%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.3% [-3.9%, -2.7%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-5.5%, -1.2%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.9% [-3.9%, 7.7%] 4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 646.729s -> 649.102s (0.37%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 25, 2023
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

No significant improvements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants