Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do not prefer substs relate during coherence #111987

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 25 additions & 9 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -231,13 +231,21 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {

let mut candidates = Vec::new();
// LHS normalizes-to RHS
candidates.extend(
evaluate_normalizes_to(self, alias_lhs, rhs, direction, Invert::No).ok(),
);
candidates.extend(evaluate_normalizes_to(
self,
alias_lhs,
rhs,
direction,
Invert::No,
));
// RHS normalizes-to RHS
candidates.extend(
evaluate_normalizes_to(self, alias_rhs, lhs, direction, Invert::Yes).ok(),
);
candidates.extend(evaluate_normalizes_to(
self,
alias_rhs,
lhs,
direction,
Invert::Yes,
));
// Relate via substs
let subst_relate_response = self.probe(|ecx| {
let span = tracing::span!(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -265,10 +273,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {

if let Some(merged) = self.try_merge_responses(&candidates) {
Ok(merged)
} else if let Ok(subst_relate_response) = subst_relate_response {
Ok(subst_relate_response)
} else {
self.flounder(&candidates)
// When relating two aliases and we have ambiguity, we prefer
// relating the generic arguments of the aliases over normalizing
// them. This is necessary for inference during typeck.
//
// As this is incomplete, we must not do so during coherence.
match (self.solver_mode(), subst_relate_response) {
(SolverMode::Normal, Ok(response)) => Ok(response),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think its unfortunate that this means that improving try_merge_responses to not require floundering as much can break code because it could cause us to not take this path, and subst_relate_response can have a stronger response than the merged one :(

(SolverMode::Normal, Err(NoSolution)) | (SolverMode::Coherence, _) => {
self.flounder(&candidates)
}
}
}
}
}
Expand Down