Mark wrapped intrinsics as inline(always)

[lu-zero]

This should mitigate having the inliner decide not to inline when the architecture is lacking an implementation of
TargetTransformInfo::areInlineCompatible aware of the target features (e.g. PowerPC as today).

See rust-lang/stdarch#1443 (comment)

[rustbot]

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[Amanieu]

Just to check if this doesn't regress debug build performance.

@bors try @rust-timer perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 528f11c with merge 3feb5a8b121d0db15dd937cc048cedd92761655c...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 3feb5a8b121d0db15dd937cc048cedd92761655c (3feb5a8b121d0db15dd937cc048cedd92761655c)

[Amanieu]

@rust-timer queue

[lqd]

@rust-timer build 3feb5a8b121d0db15dd937cc048cedd92761655c

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (3feb5a8b121d0db15dd937cc048cedd92761655c): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.6%	[0.5%, 3.1%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-1.0%, -0.6%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.6%	[-1.6%, -1.6%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.8%	[-1.0%, 3.1%]	6

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.0%	[-0.4%, 2.4%]	2

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.0%]	12
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, 0.0%]	17

Bootstrap: 660.64s -> 658.974s (-0.25%)

[thomcc]

Looks good, glad to see a (cleaner) fix for that stdarch issue (hopefully)

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 528f11c has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 528f11c with merge 6b06fdf...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: thomcc
Pushing 6b06fdf to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (6b06fdf): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.3%	[1.3%, 1.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-3.6%, -1.0%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.4%	[-3.6%, 1.3%]	4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.0%	[0.5%, 1.7%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.7%	[2.7%, 2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.0%	[0.5%, 1.7%]	3

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.0%]	12
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, 0.0%]	17

Bootstrap: 661.53s -> 662.02s (0.07%)