Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #113293

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

GuillaumeGomez and others added 8 commits July 3, 2023 13:26
…, r=lcnr

Implement selection via new trait solver

Implements selection via the new solver by calling into `assemble_and_evaluate_candidates`, doing a very light-weight "winnow" to choose one candidate over the others, and then re-confirming that candidate outside of the `EvalCtxt` in order to compute the information necessary for the `ImplSource`.

This selection routine is best effort -- if it receives an ambiguous response from the `EvalCtxt`, then it may return ambiguity if the work to re-confirm the goal is not "easy" -- right now, that means everything except for object and impl goals. Since we don't want to reimplement all of the work of the `compute_builtin_*` methods in the solver internals, we bail out if we encounter ambiguity more often than the old solver. This should only barely affect [method selection](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/f798ada7babac06d4611b0b3a6079d8399ab58ab/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/probe.rs#L1447) and not codegen. It can be made more precise later if needed.

r? `@lcnr`
…-cfg, r=notriddle

[rustdoc] Fix display of long inline cfg labels

Fixes rust-lang#87957.
Fixes rust-lang#112880.

Before:

![Screenshot from 2023-07-03 13-25-47](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/3050060/401e2c6b-2cfd-4ae3-9d15-b5e1dfec4201)

After:

![Screenshot from 2023-07-03 13-24-49](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/3050060/e42a34a8-bf60-409d-8a0c-1669d09e7e1e)

r? `@notriddle`
…led, r=compiler-errors

Don't perform selection if inherent associated types are not enabled

Fixes rust-lang#113265.

As discussed
r? `@compiler-errors`
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 3, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 3, 2023

📌 Commit 157bab6 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 3, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 3, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 157bab6 with merge 8931edf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 3, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 8931edf to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 3, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 8931edf into rust-lang:master Jul 3, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jul 3, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#112869 Implement selection via new trait solver 528af93eb1caa20690fef5c72148c5d32793e9d0 (link)
#113285 [rustdoc] Fix display of long inline cfg labels c332b84e5551628b711de28282909eb49b2565c5 (link)
#113286 Don't perform selection if inherent associated types are no… 8a5c9db3b01c944a2e956bf366c41233bd0d104c (link)

previous master: 3ae0ef79fe

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (8931edf): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.0% [1.0%, 1.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.6% [-2.6%, -2.5%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 670.578s -> 670.457s (-0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants