Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamically size sigaltstk in rustc #113528

Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
27 changes: 22 additions & 5 deletions compiler/rustc_driver_impl/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1453,13 +1453,13 @@ mod signal_handler {
/// When an error signal (such as SIGABRT or SIGSEGV) is delivered to the
/// process, print a stack trace and then exit.
pub(super) fn install() {
use std::alloc::{alloc, Layout};

unsafe {
const ALT_STACK_SIZE: usize = libc::MINSIGSTKSZ + 64 * 1024;
let alt_stack_size: usize = min_sigstack_size() + 64 * 1024;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might seem like 64KiB is greater than the largest number I mentioned, 16KiB.

...but it's up to 16KiB per vector register, and it has way more than one. 🫠

let mut alt_stack: libc::stack_t = std::mem::zeroed();
alt_stack.ss_sp =
std::alloc::alloc(std::alloc::Layout::from_size_align(ALT_STACK_SIZE, 1).unwrap())
as *mut libc::c_void;
alt_stack.ss_size = ALT_STACK_SIZE;
alt_stack.ss_sp = alloc(Layout::from_size_align(alt_stack_size, 1).unwrap()).cast();
alt_stack.ss_size = alt_stack_size;
libc::sigaltstack(&alt_stack, std::ptr::null_mut());

let mut sa: libc::sigaction = std::mem::zeroed();
Expand All @@ -1469,6 +1469,23 @@ mod signal_handler {
libc::sigaction(libc::SIGSEGV, &sa, std::ptr::null_mut());
}
}

/// Modern kernels on modern hardware can have dynamic signal stack sizes.
#[cfg(any(target_os = "linux", target_os = "android"))]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I have spoken to people who run rustc on Android.

fn min_sigstack_size() -> usize {
const AT_MINSIGSTKSZ: core::ffi::c_ulong = 51;
let dynamic_sigstksz = unsafe { libc::getauxval(AT_MINSIGSTKSZ) };
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doesn't need to block this PR, but does it make sense to upstream AT_MINSIGSTKSZ to the libc crate so we don't need to hardcode it here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you mean would it be good for rust-lang/libc#3125 to be reviewed and accepted? yes, I think so.

// If getauxval couldn't find the entry, it returns 0,
// so take the higher of the "constant" and auxval.
// This transparently supports older kernels which don't provide AT_MINSIGSTKSZ
libc::MINSIGSTKSZ.max(dynamic_sigstksz as _)
}

/// Not all OS support hardware where this is needed.
#[cfg(not(any(target_os = "linux", target_os = "android")))]
fn min_sigstack_size() -> usize {
libc::MINSIGSTKSZ
}
}

#[cfg(not(all(unix, any(target_env = "gnu", target_os = "macos"))))]
Expand Down