Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #114184

Closed
wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jyn514 and others added 20 commits July 26, 2023 14:43
proc-macros are processed early in the compiler pipeline. There is no
need to involve codegen. So change to check-pass.

I have also looked through each changed test and to me it is
sufficiently clear that codegen is not needed for the purpose of the
test.

I skipped changing tests/ui/proc-macro/no-missing-docs.rs in this commit
because it was not clear to me that it can be changed to check-pass.
Not useful, for there is just a single example
…=cjgillot

Don't attempt to compute layout of type referencing error

Leads to more ICEs and strange diagnostics than are worth it.

Fixes rust-lang#113760
Prevent people from assigning me as a PR reviewer

depends on rust-lang/triagebot#1712
tests/ui/proc-macro/*: Migrate FIXMEs to check-pass

proc-macros are processed early in the compiler pipeline. There is no need to involve codegen. So change to check-pass.

I have also looked through each changed test and to me it is sufficiently clear that codegen is not needed for the purpose of the test.

I skipped changing `tests/ui/proc-macro/no-missing-docs.rs` in this commit because it was not clear to me that it can be changed to check-pass.

Part of rust-lang#62277
…notriddle

Rustdoc small cleanups

Each commit does some little cleanups:

 * We had some `Res` comparisons in multiple places (and still do, but unless we use a macro, it's not possible to "merge" any further) so I moved it into a function.
 * It was weird to have some utils function used everywhere in `visit_ast` so I instead moved it into `clean/utils.rs`.
 * In HTML rendering, we had some write "issues":
   * Multiple calls that could be merged into one.
   * Some `write!` that could be `write_str`.
   * We didn't use the new `format!` args much.

r? `@notriddle`
…est, r=workingjubilee

Fix switch-stdout test for none unix/windows platforms

PR rust-lang#112390 moved tests to std. Unfortunately, there is a typo which causes issues on platforms other than unix and windows.
…g_test, r=workingjubilee

Fix issue_15149 test for the SGX target

PR rust-lang#112390 moved tests to std. Unfortunately, this caused the `issue_15149` test to be enabled for the SGX target. This is incorrect as the SGX target does not support the `env::current_exe()` call.
btree/map.rs: remove "Basic usage" text

Not useful, for there is just a single example
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 28, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2023

📌 Commit 2b2fa47 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 28, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113522) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 29, 2023
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-uiqr2xg branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants