Cache reachable_set on disk

[tmiasko]

No description provided.

[tmiasko]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 5d3244c with merge a5a1d39f163bf802e22c4e1aa7f53ded6bc10d74...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a5a1d39f163bf802e22c4e1aa7f53ded6bc10d74 (a5a1d39f163bf802e22c4e1aa7f53ded6bc10d74)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (a5a1d39f163bf802e22c4e1aa7f53ded6bc10d74): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.4%	[-2.4%, -0.4%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.2%	[-8.3%, -0.4%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.4%	[-2.4%, -0.4%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.6%	[4.6%, 4.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-2.4%, -0.6%]	12
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.4%	[-4.9%, -4.0%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-2.4%, -0.6%]	12

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.5%, 2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-3.4%, -1.6%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.0%	[-8.6%, -1.9%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-3.4%, -1.6%]	6

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Bootstrap: 629.704s -> 629.524s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 317.61 MiB -> 317.56 MiB (-0.02%)

[tmiasko]

r? @cjgillot

[cjgillot]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 5d3244c has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 5d3244c with merge fd70f7e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing fd70f7e to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (fd70f7e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.6%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-2.4%, -0.3%]	8
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-8.2%, -0.8%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-2.4%, 0.4%]	9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.6%, -0.9%]	16
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-4.8%, -1.8%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.6%, -0.9%]	16

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-3.1%, -1.4%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.2%	[-7.9%, -3.0%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-3.1%, -1.4%]	5

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Bootstrap: 632.342s -> 633.123s (0.12%)
Artifact size: 318.18 MiB -> 318.10 MiB (-0.02%)