Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coverage: Simplify internal representation of debug types #115867

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 16, 2023

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Sep 15, 2023

Most of these debug helper types store each of their fields as Option<T>, and then set them to Some when the relevant debug checks are enabled. This makes the struct fields awkward to read and results in some contortions when accessing the field values.

This PR addresses those problems by changing each of the helper types to have a single state: Option<FooState> field. Each individual method can then obtain the state up-front (or return early if it is absent), allowing the rest of the code to just access the state's contents directly.


There are some more improvements I'd like to make to the debug code, but for this PR I'm focusing on a straightforward mechanical change that should be fairly easy to review.

(I did thrown in a few trivial changes to imports and docs, along with one switch from FxHashMap to FxHashSet.)


Most of the changed lines are just indentation churn, so ignoring whitespace is recommended.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 15, 2023

r? @wesleywiser

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 15, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 15, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Sep 15, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Sep 16, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

📌 Commit 91e0b46 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 16, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#115860 (Enable varargs support for AAPCS calling convention)
 - rust-lang#115867 (coverage: Simplify internal representation of debug types)
 - rust-lang#115885 (don't globally ignore rustc-ice files)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#115873 (Make `TyKind::Adt`'s `Debug` impl be more pretty)
 - rust-lang#115884 (make ty::Const debug printing less verbose)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 77e0102 into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 16, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#115867 - Zalathar:debug, r=oli-obk

coverage: Simplify internal representation of debug types

Most of these debug helper types store each of their fields as `Option<T>`, and then set them to `Some` when the relevant debug checks are enabled. This makes the struct fields awkward to read and results in some contortions when accessing the field values.

This PR addresses those problems by changing each of the helper types to have a single `state: Option<FooState>` field. Each individual method can then obtain the state up-front (or return early if it is absent), allowing the rest of the code to just access the state's contents directly.

---

There are some more improvements I'd like to make to the debug code, but for this PR I'm focusing on a straightforward mechanical change that should be fairly easy to review.

(I did thrown in a few trivial changes to imports and docs, along with one switch from `FxHashMap` to `FxHashSet`.)

---

Most of the changed lines are just indentation churn, so ignoring whitespace is recommended.
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the debug branch September 17, 2023 00:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants