simplify inject_impl_of_structural_trait #115891
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @wesleywiser (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Changes to the code generated for builtin derived traits. cc @nnethercote |
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
structural-trait-derive
branch
from
c747660
to
490678f
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
nnethercote
reviewed
Sep 16, 2023
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
structural-trait-derive
branch
from
490678f
to
0d29398
Compare
|
r? @nnethercote |
|
r=me after squashing the commits. @bors delegate=RalfJung |
|
✌️ @RalfJung, you can now approve this pull request! If @nnethercote told you to " |
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
structural-trait-derive
branch
from
0ead26f
to
0522bde
Compare
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
…r=nnethercote simplify inject_impl_of_structural_trait There's a comment at `inject_impl_of_structural_trait` saying we cannot use `TraitDef`, but that comment is outdated -- we *can* use `TraitDef` nowadays since it has the `skip_path_as_bound` flag. (The flag needed some fixing, though.)
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109409 (Add `minmax{,_by,_by_key}` functions to `core::cmp`) - rust-lang#115494 (get rid of duplicate primitive_docs) - rust-lang#115663 (ci: actions/checkout@v3 to actions/checkout@v4) - rust-lang#115762 (Explain revealing of opaque types in layout_of ParamEnv) - rust-lang#115891 (simplify inject_impl_of_structural_trait) - rust-lang#115932 (Expand infra-ci reviewer list) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109409 (Add `minmax{,_by,_by_key}` functions to `core::cmp`) - rust-lang#115494 (get rid of duplicate primitive_docs) - rust-lang#115663 (ci: actions/checkout@v3 to actions/checkout@v4) - rust-lang#115762 (Explain revealing of opaque types in layout_of ParamEnv) - rust-lang#115891 (simplify inject_impl_of_structural_trait) - rust-lang#115932 (Expand infra-ci reviewer list) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#115891 - RalfJung:structural-trait-derive, r=nnethercote simplify inject_impl_of_structural_trait There's a comment at `inject_impl_of_structural_trait` saying we cannot use `TraitDef`, but that comment is outdated -- we *can* use `TraitDef` nowadays since it has the `skip_path_as_bound` flag. (The flag needed some fixing, though.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's a comment at
inject_impl_of_structural_traitsaying we cannot useTraitDef, but that comment is outdated -- we can useTraitDefnowadays since it has theskip_path_as_boundflag. (The flag needed some fixing, though.)