Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix def-use check for call terminators #117359

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 15, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented Oct 29, 2023

Fixes #117331.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 29, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 29, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@tmiasko tmiasko changed the title Fix def-use check for a call terminators Fix def-use check for call terminators Oct 29, 2023
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

r=me once #117330 is merged.

@cjgillot cjgillot added S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 4, 2023
@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmiasko commented Nov 14, 2023

@bors r=cjgillot

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

📌 Commit 62db181 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Nov 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 62db181 with merge 844dfa7...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 14, 2023
@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmiasko commented Nov 14, 2023

Adjusted the test by adding needs-unwind.

@bors r=cjgillot

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

📌 Commit 6873465 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 15, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 6873465 with merge 170046d...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 15, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 15, 2023
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 15, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmiasko commented Nov 15, 2023

@bors retry (docker failure)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 15, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 15, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 6873465 with merge 6d069a0...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 15, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing 6d069a0 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 15, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 6d069a0 into rust-lang:master Nov 15, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 15, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6d069a0): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.7% [3.7%, 3.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.1% [1.8%, 2.3%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 675.319s -> 676.301s (0.15%)
Artifact size: 311.09 MiB -> 311.10 MiB (0.00%)

@tmiasko tmiasko deleted the call-def branch November 15, 2023 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Instruction does not dominate all uses
6 participants