New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DO NOT MERGE] Introduce mechanism to write compiler metrics to disk #118854
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
r? @cjgillot (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[DO NOT MERGE] Introduce mechanism to write compiler metrics to disk I want to verify the performance impact of enabling this new behavior against perf.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
4aa316e
to
8a17f68
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ea763d5
to
6c24541
Compare
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[DO NOT MERGE] Introduce mechanism to write compiler metrics to disk I want to verify the performance impact of enabling this new behavior against perf.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[DO NOT MERGE] Introduce mechanism to write compiler metrics to disk I want to verify the performance impact of enabling this new behavior against perf.
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (ede0202): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 672.799s -> 674.95s (0.32%) |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message
|
c7b5e9d
to
38b8d4b
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[DO NOT MERGE] Introduce mechanism to write compiler metrics to disk I want to verify the performance impact of enabling this new behavior against perf.
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (6c07765): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 673.56s -> 673.417s (-0.02%) |
I want to verify the performance impact of enabling this new behavior against perf.