Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8 #120528

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2024

Conversation

GnomedDev
Copy link
Contributor

BacktraceStyle easily fits into a u8, so SHOULD_CAPTURE, which is just Atomic<Option<BacktraceStyle>>, should be stored as AtomicU8

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 31, 2024

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 31, 2024
@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 31, 2024

Some targets don't have efficient byte atomics, so this may be worse for performance. I think for a single static variable, this small storage optimization is probably not worth it. Did you have more motivation here, or is it "just because"?

@GnomedDev
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a follow up to #118798, I don't exactly have a reason, but it's just nice to save these small amounts of memory on all compiled Rust programs.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 31, 2024

For an example, we had this discussion about AtomicBool on RISC-V:
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/AtomicBool.20useless.20on.20riscv

@Nilstrieb did you consider that in your other review?

@Nilstrieb
Copy link
Member

Nilstrieb commented Jan 31, 2024

I definitely read (and even participated in, lol) that discussion, but forgot about it and did not consider the performance impact of the PR, thanks for pointing that out! I doubt the performance in #118798 (or here) really matters - but it's not like the size of the atomic matters either.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 31, 2024

Yeah, I suppose panics and backtraces should be on the cold path anyway, and even then the more frequent case in this PR is just going to be the load. It's probably fine.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 31, 2024

📌 Commit 7ea4dbb has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 31, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
…, r=cuviper

Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8

`BacktraceStyle` easily fits into a u8, so `SHOULD_CAPTURE`, which is just `Atomic<Option<BacktraceStyle>>`, should be stored as `AtomicU8`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
…, r=cuviper

Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8

`BacktraceStyle` easily fits into a u8, so `SHOULD_CAPTURE`, which is just `Atomic<Option<BacktraceStyle>>`, should be stored as `AtomicU8`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120484 (Avoid ICE when is_val_statically_known is not of a supported type)
 - rust-lang#120516 (pattern_analysis: cleanup manual impls)
 - rust-lang#120517 (never patterns: It is correct to lower `!` to `_`.)
 - rust-lang#120523 (Improve `io::Read::read_buf_exact` error case)
 - rust-lang#120528 (Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8)
 - rust-lang#120529 (Update data layouts in custom target tests for LLVM 18)
 - rust-lang#120530 (Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety)
 - rust-lang#120531 (Remove a bunch of `has_errors` checks that have no meaningful or the wrong effect)
 - rust-lang#120533 (Correct paths for hexagon-unknown-none-elf platform doc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120484 (Avoid ICE when is_val_statically_known is not of a supported type)
 - rust-lang#120516 (pattern_analysis: cleanup manual impls)
 - rust-lang#120517 (never patterns: It is correct to lower `!` to `_`.)
 - rust-lang#120523 (Improve `io::Read::read_buf_exact` error case)
 - rust-lang#120528 (Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8)
 - rust-lang#120529 (Update data layouts in custom target tests for LLVM 18)
 - rust-lang#120530 (Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety)
 - rust-lang#120531 (Remove a bunch of `has_errors` checks that have no meaningful or the wrong effect)
 - rust-lang#120533 (Correct paths for hexagon-unknown-none-elf platform doc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120484 (Avoid ICE when is_val_statically_known is not of a supported type)
 - rust-lang#120516 (pattern_analysis: cleanup manual impls)
 - rust-lang#120517 (never patterns: It is correct to lower `!` to `_`.)
 - rust-lang#120523 (Improve `io::Read::read_buf_exact` error case)
 - rust-lang#120528 (Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8)
 - rust-lang#120529 (Update data layouts in custom target tests for LLVM 18)
 - rust-lang#120530 (Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety)
 - rust-lang#120531 (Remove a bunch of `has_errors` checks that have no meaningful or the wrong effect)
 - rust-lang#120533 (Correct paths for hexagon-unknown-none-elf platform doc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120484 (Avoid ICE when is_val_statically_known is not of a supported type)
 - rust-lang#120516 (pattern_analysis: cleanup manual impls)
 - rust-lang#120517 (never patterns: It is correct to lower `!` to `_`.)
 - rust-lang#120523 (Improve `io::Read::read_buf_exact` error case)
 - rust-lang#120528 (Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8)
 - rust-lang#120529 (Update data layouts in custom target tests for LLVM 18)
 - rust-lang#120531 (Remove a bunch of `has_errors` checks that have no meaningful or the wrong effect)
 - rust-lang#120533 (Correct paths for hexagon-unknown-none-elf platform doc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3e24351 into rust-lang:master Feb 4, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 4, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120528 - GnomedDev:atomicu8-backtrace-style, r=cuviper

Store SHOULD_CAPTURE as AtomicU8

`BacktraceStyle` easily fits into a u8, so `SHOULD_CAPTURE`, which is just `Atomic<Option<BacktraceStyle>>`, should be stored as `AtomicU8`
@GnomedDev GnomedDev deleted the atomicu8-backtrace-style branch February 5, 2024 01:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants