Rewrite select (in the new solver) to use a ProofTreeVisitor
#124529
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
|
r? lcnr |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
select
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b7b5763
to
be1d5f4
Compare
lcnr
reviewed
Apr 29, 2024
lcnr
reviewed
Apr 29, 2024
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #124558) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
select
branch
2 times, most recently
from
32aec4d
to
6760051
Compare
|
@bors r=lcnr rollup (new solver only) |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2024
Rewrite select (in the new solver) to use a `ProofTreeVisitor` We can use a proof tree visitor rather than collecting and recomputing all the nested goals ourselves. Based on rust-lang#124415
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124529 (Rewrite select (in the new solver) to use a `ProofTreeVisitor`) - rust-lang#124542 (Add diagnostic item for `std::iter::Iterator::enumerate`) - rust-lang#124566 (fix `NormalizesTo` proof tree issue) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
@bors r- ^ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r=lcnr |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (f92d49b): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 674.001s -> 674.637s (0.09%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We can use a proof tree visitor rather than collecting and recomputing all the nested goals ourselves.
Based on #124415