Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustfmt more tests #125948

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

rustfmt more tests #125948

merged 11 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

This finishes the formatting of tests begun in #125759 and continued in #125912.

r? @lqd

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 4, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 4, 2024

Some changes occurred in GUI tests.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jun 4, 2024

I'm not sure if some of the rustdoc tests are always run locally, and on PR CI, compared to post-review, so we may we surprised by failures in obscure builders, we'll see.

It's also possible that e.g. some of the js-std suites are never intended to contain rust files, in which case it's a tossup whether to explicitly ignore the folder and document it as such.

I'll let Guillaume chime in on this by the time the PR reaches the top of the queue.

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 4, 2024

📌 Commit d2ea692 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 4, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 4, 2024

⌛ Testing commit d2ea692 with merge bc33782...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 4, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lqd
Pushing bc33782 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 4, 2024
@bors bors merged commit bc33782 into rust-lang:master Jun 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 4, 2024
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
Remove `tests/run-make-fulldeps/pretty-expanded`

This was an ancient regression test for rust-lang#12685, caused by `-Zunpretty=expanded` crashing on certain code produced by `#[derive(RustcEncodable)]`.

Given that this test predates `//@ pretty-expanded` tests, and was tied to ancient implementation details of the pretty-printer and `#[derive(RustcEncodable)]` (which the test no longer even uses), I think we can safely delete it.

---

Spotted via rust-lang#125948.
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (bc33782): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 673.596s -> 669.797s (-0.56%)
Artifact size: 318.88 MiB -> 318.88 MiB (-0.00%)

@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the rustfmt-more-tests branch June 4, 2024 20:56
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125973 - Zalathar:pretty, r=lqd

Remove `tests/run-make-fulldeps/pretty-expanded`

This was an ancient regression test for rust-lang#12685, caused by `-Zunpretty=expanded` crashing on certain code produced by `#[derive(RustcEncodable)]`.

Given that this test predates `//@ pretty-expanded` tests, and was tied to ancient implementation details of the pretty-printer and `#[derive(RustcEncodable)]` (which the test no longer even uses), I think we can safely delete it.

---

Spotted via rust-lang#125948.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants