Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libcore: Reexport a couple of widely-used low-level intrinsics to reduce #15569

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2014

Conversation

pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

code bloat.

This didn't make a difference in any compile times that I saw, but it
fits what we're doing with transmute and seems prudent.

r? @alexcrichton

code bloat.

This didn't make a difference in any compile times that I saw, but it
fits what we're doing with `transmute` and seems prudent.
@emberian
Copy link
Member

Does somewhat unsightly things to our docs... maybe we should add a #[canonical] attribute that rustdoc understands to mean that "this is where this item should be documented, don't just link to the other one"

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2014
code bloat.

This didn't make a difference in any compile times that I saw, but it
fits what we're doing with `transmute` and seems prudent.

r? @alexcrichton
@bors bors closed this Jul 10, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 6f96abf into rust-lang:master Jul 10, 2014
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Switch to in-tree rustc dependencies with a cfg flag

We can use this flag to detect and prevent breakages in rustc CI. (see rust-lang#14846 and rust-lang#15569)

~The `IN_RUSTC_REPOSITORY` is just a placeholder. Is there any existing cfg flag that rustc CI sets?~
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants