make for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... } a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR.
#21984
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of
ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding
the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop
itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by
niko (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here
is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a
semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e.,
it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot
actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test
by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new
striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
|
Note that this landing this is blocked on PR #21980. That is, on my machine with my other commits, if you do not have a robust codemap, then you end up ICE'ing (for me, its while compiling librand with (It is possible that some different way of manipulating the spans than what I did here would resolve the above problem. But I think its more important that we first land this change to the terminating scopes before we worry too much about span handling.) |
|
(oh, and this was spawned off of #21972) |
|
🙀 You have the wrong number! Please try again with |
|
@bors don't be so nosy |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2015
…=nikomatsakis
make `for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... }` a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR.
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by @nikomatsakis (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e., it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2019
Introduce hir::ExprKind::Use and employ in for loop desugaring.
In the `for $pat in $expr $block` desugaring we end with a `{ let _result = $match_expr; _result }` construct which makes `for` loops into a terminating scope and affects drop order. The construct was introduced in year 2015 by @pnkfelix in #21984.
This PR replaces the construct with `hir::ExprKind::Use(P<hir::Expr>)` which is equivalent semantically but should hopefully be less costly in terms of compile time performance (to be determined).
This is extracted out of 91b0abd from #59288 for easier review and so that the perf implications wrt. `for`-loops can be measured.
r? @oli-obk
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2019
…ps, r=oli-obk
Introduce hir::ExprKind::Use and employ in for loop desugaring.
In the `for $pat in $expr $block` desugaring we end with a `{ let _result = $match_expr; _result }` construct which makes `for` loops into a terminating scope and affects drop order. The construct was introduced in year 2015 by @pnkfelix in rust-lang#21984.
This PR replaces the construct with `hir::ExprKind::Use(P<hir::Expr>)` which is equivalent semantically but should hopefully be less costly in terms of compile time performance (to be determined).
This is extracted out of rust-lang@91b0abd from rust-lang#59288 for easier review and so that the perf implications wrt. `for`-loops can be measured.
r? @oli-obk
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2019
…ps, r=oli-obk
Introduce hir::ExprKind::Use and employ in for loop desugaring.
In the `for $pat in $expr $block` desugaring we end with a `{ let _result = $match_expr; _result }` construct which makes `for` loops into a terminating scope and affects drop order. The construct was introduced in year 2015 by @pnkfelix in rust-lang#21984.
This PR replaces the construct with `hir::ExprKind::Use(P<hir::Expr>)` which is equivalent semantically but should hopefully be less costly in terms of compile time performance (to be determined).
This is extracted out of rust-lang@91b0abd from rust-lang#59288 for easier review and so that the perf implications wrt. `for`-loops can be measured.
r? @oli-obk
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2019
…ps, r=oli-obk
Introduce hir::ExprKind::Use and employ in for loop desugaring.
In the `for $pat in $expr $block` desugaring we end with a `{ let _result = $match_expr; _result }` construct which makes `for` loops into a terminating scope and affects drop order. The construct was introduced in year 2015 by @pnkfelix in rust-lang#21984.
This PR replaces the construct with `hir::ExprKind::Use(P<hir::Expr>)` which is equivalent semantically but should hopefully be less costly in terms of compile time performance (to be determined).
This is extracted out of rust-lang@91b0abd from rust-lang#59288 for easier review and so that the perf implications wrt. `for`-loops can be measured.
r? @oli-obk
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
make
for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... }a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR.In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop itself, and no longer.
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by @nikomatsakis (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here is that case:
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e., it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new striction.)
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]