Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

static recursion test added to compile-fail test suite #39834

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 16, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
49 changes: 49 additions & 0 deletions src/test/compile-fail/feature-gate-static_recursion.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
// Copyright 2015 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: current year

// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

static mut S: *const u8 = unsafe { &S as *const *const u8 as *const u8 };
//~^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)

struct StaticDoubleLinked {
prev: &'static StaticDoubleLinked,
next: &'static StaticDoubleLinked,
data: i32,
head: bool,
}

static L1: StaticDoubleLinked = StaticDoubleLinked{prev: &L3, next: &L2, data: 1, head: true};
//~^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)
//~^^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)
//~^^^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This won't work, and is not what @jseyfried meant. Just make one line of code, followed by one line of comment, then one line of code, etc.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I figured, it's just that the problem here is that it complains that the issue is always at line 21, and it is expecting 3 errors, which is confusing to me. Any ideas on why that is happening

Copy link
Contributor Author

@cseale cseale Feb 15, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this:

static L1: StaticDoubleLinked = StaticDoubleLinked{prev: &L3, next: &L2, data: 1, head: true};
//~^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)
static L2: StaticDoubleLinked = StaticDoubleLinked{prev: &L1, next: &L3, data: 2, head: false};
//~^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)
static L3: StaticDoubleLinked = StaticDoubleLinked{prev: &L2, next: &L1, data: 3, head: false};
//~^ ERROR recursive static (see issue #29719)

fails with this error:

unexpected errors (from JSON output): [
    Error {
        line_num: 21,
        kind: Some(
            Error
        ),
        msg: "21:1: 21:95: recursive static (see issue #29719)"
    },
    Error {
        line_num: 21,
        kind: Some(
            Error
        ),
        msg: "21:1: 21:95: recursive static (see issue #29719)"
    }
]

not found errors (from test file): [
    Error {
        line_num: 23,
        kind: Some(
            Error
        ),
        msg: "recursive static (see issue #29719)"
    },
    Error {
        line_num: 25,
        kind: Some(
            Error
        ),
        msg: "recursive static (see issue #29719)"
    }
]

Sorry, I probably should have led with this in the comments as opposed to making a dumb looking edit. I don't understand why line 21 throws 3 of the same error

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm seems its a bug or something. See, that's why we are adding these tests.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'll approve it and then file a PR to fix the error message bug.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool ^_^

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm seems its more complicated than I thought. I think I'll let it be, its "only" a feature gate test. But I'll file an issue so that it doesn't get forgotten.

static L2: StaticDoubleLinked = StaticDoubleLinked{prev: &L1, next: &L3, data: 2, head: false};
static L3: StaticDoubleLinked = StaticDoubleLinked{prev: &L2, next: &L1, data: 3, head: false};


pub fn main() {
unsafe { assert_eq!(S, *(S as *const *const u8)); }

let mut test_vec = Vec::new();
let mut cur = &L1;
loop {
test_vec.push(cur.data);
cur = cur.next;
if cur.head { break }
}
assert_eq!(&test_vec, &[1,2,3]);

let mut test_vec = Vec::new();
let mut cur = &L1;
loop {
cur = cur.prev;
test_vec.push(cur.data);
if cur.head { break }
}
assert_eq!(&test_vec, &[3,2,1]);
}
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/tools/tidy/src/features.rs
Expand Up @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ pub fn check(path: &Path, bad: &mut bool) {

// FIXME get this whitelist empty.
let whitelist = vec![
"abi_ptx", "simd", "static_recursion",
"abi_ptx", "simd",
"cfg_target_has_atomic",
"unboxed_closures", "stmt_expr_attributes",
"cfg_target_thread_local", "unwind_attributes",
Expand Down